There Must Be A Pony In Here Somewhere
- In Search of America's ‘Hottest Forecasters’
- Mick Fleetwood on the MP3 ‘Dumbing Down’ of Music
- How to Get Your Name on the Bathroom Wall 4-EVER
- What’s More Important to Baby Boomers Than Money
- Is America Ready for a Bacon Milkshake?
- ‘Goodnight iPad’ — A Bedtime Story for Adults
- How to Save an Unproductive Work Day
- Can't Get in on the Facebook IPO, How About a Real Gamble?
- Funny Businesses For Ex-Lovers and Office Meetings
- Guess What? Time to Change Your Password—and Buy Flowers
CONTRIBUTORS
#PONYBLOG ON TWITTER
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Why a Pony? To be clear, there were no ponies harmed in the making of this blog. The blog’s name, “There Must Be a Pony In Here Somewhere,” comes from an old joke, a favorite of Ronald Reagan’s, that essentially means, with a pile of you-know-what this big, there MUST be a pony—a bright side—in here somewhere!

Power Trip: Lawmakers Propose US 'Kill Switch' for Internet
CNBC.com Staff Writer
While the rest of the world was was watching BP and Europe this week, some U.S. lawmakers were hatching a plan for a “kill switch” for the Internet.
![]() |
fotog | Getty Images Press here to shut off the Internet. Thank you. Have a nice day. |
Joe Lieberman, the former running mate of Al “I invented the Internet” Gore and current chair of the Homeland Security committee, has proposed the legislation, along with Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine, and Democratic Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware.
“The Internet may have started out as a communications oddity some 40 years ago but it is now a necessity of modern life and, sadly, one that is under constant attack,” Lieberman said in a press release outlining the proposed legislation, noting that everything from key infrastructure to bank accounts and industrial secrets all live on the Internet and is vulnerable to attack.
“We cannot afford to wait for a ‘cyber 9/11’ before our government finally realizes the importance of our digital resources,” said Sen. Collins said.
The legislation would not only create such a kill switch but would give the sole power to press it to the U.S. president during times of national emergency.
Why would the president have such power, you ask? Of course, because the Internet is the property of the U.S.A.—or at least that's what a person would assume after learning the bill's name: The “Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act,” as it's called, would create an Internet-regulatory arm within the Department of Homeland Security, which “would enforce cybersecurity policies throughout the government and the private sector.”
The government would essentially draw up a list of private companies involved in the Internet, from broadband providers to search engines — you know, like Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
], Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] and Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] — and any company on that list would have to “immediately comply with any emergency measure or action developed.”
Halfway around the world in Australia, Bjorn Landfeldt, an associate professor at the University of Sydney, pointed out that the Internet, ahem, involves the "THE ENTIRE WORLD" and likened such a power to giving a single country “the right to poison the atmosphere or poison the ocean,” according to a story in Australian newspaper The Age.
I think after this week’s dramatic episode of “The Bold and the Apologetic” on Capitol Hill, where Texas Rep. Joe Barton bone-headedly apologized to BP President Tony Hayward instead of grilling him, we can all agree that before we can grant anyone a “kill switch” for the Internet, we’re gonna need a “kill switch” for Congress!
Questions? Comments? Write to us at .
More from the Pony Blog at ponyblog.cnbc.com









