- More Asset-Buying Depends on Economy: BOE
- Stocks Sputter as Investors Seek Next Catalyst
- Winners and Losers in Obama's Corporate Tax Plan
- Santorum Takes Heavy Fire in Arizona Republican Debate
- Volcker Rule Threatens Recovery: Finance Ministers
- Next Bank of England Governor: The Race is On
- HP, Dell Watch Rising China Labor Costs for Apple
- China Internet Firm Qihoo Says Citron Allegations False
- Romney Proposes Slashing Top Tax Rate to 28 Percent
- Wandering Through Toy Land
- Dell Is Done, But Don't Discount HP: Analysts
- Comcast Deal Could Spell Trouble for Netflix: Analyst
- Reading the Tea Leaves in RIM Shake-Up
- Sam Adams Brewer Crafts Beer for the Granddaddy of All Marathons
- Stocks to Give Up for Lent
- You Want Retail Customers? Give Them Deals: Analysts
- NJ Governor Chris Christie to Warren Buffett: 'Just Write a Check and Shut Up'
- 7 Undervalued IPO Stocks That Could Rebound in 2012
MOST SHARED
- More Asset-Buying Depends on Economy: Bank of England
- RBS to Pay Out $627 Million in Bonuses Despite Loss
- Japan Manufacturing Mood Dips to Levels After Quake
- Household Debt, Not Politics, Worry for Australia: Economist
- Japan's Sumo Belly Flops to $50 Million Debt
- 7 Undervalued IPO Stocks That Could Rebound in 2012
- Credit Agricole Posts $4.1 Billion Fourth Quarter Loss
- Break-Up, Greece Cause Huge 2011 Dexia Loss
- What if Mitt Romney Had Been President in 2009?
- The Rise and Fall of a Multibillion-Dollar Ponzi Scheme
MOST POPULAR
HOT ON FACEBOOK
Settlement Is Win for Goldman Despite Record Fine
Text Size 
Senior Editor, CNBC.com
Goldman Sachs scored a major victory in its legal battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission today, despite agreeing to pay a record-setting fine of $550 million.
 |
Getty Images |
] admitted to omitting important information from the marketing materials for the Abacus subprime mortgage derivative products it sold in 2007. But that settlement is far smaller than the $1 billion many expected.
More importantly, Goldman avoided the fraud allegations it feared the most. The one misdeed it to which it confessed—omitting the role of hedge fund manager John Paulson in selecting the securities that went into the synthetic collateralized debt obligation at the heart of the case—is the least damaging in terms of Goldman’s reputation and future legal liability.
In its original complaint, the SEC had accused Goldman of violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act. Both are anti-fraud provisions. Like most anti-fraud statutes, Section 10(b) requires the government to prove a fraudulent intent. The first subsection of Section 17(a) also requires proof of fraudulent intent.
But the second and third subsections of 17(a) do not require any proof of intent to defraud.
This makes accusations based on the second and third subsections much easier to prove—and perhaps easier for Goldman to stomach.
In fact, subsection 17(a)(2) does not even employ any form of the word “fraud” or “deceit.” It makes the sale of a security or a derivative unlawful if a material omission renders the sale merely “misleading.” That seems to be what Goldman has admitted to doing in the settlement.
All references to violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act were dropped.
Sources have told CNBC that this allegation of misleading by omission was far more palatable to the Goldman because it does not explicitly implicate Goldman in fraud.
Importantly, most federal courts hold that violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act do not give rise to private actions by outside investors.
This means that paying a fine and making this omission will not necessarily give ammunition to plaintiff’s lawyers who are suing Goldman in separate lawsuits.
Although you will never hear them admit it, somewhere Goldman’s lawyers and executives are probably popping the cork on a bottle of bubbly.
This settlement was a win for them.
- The economy is heating up but the Fed isn’t letting up. How do you play the fixed-income market?
- With its rich oil reserves and rampant corruption, Azerbaijan poses a dilemma for U.S. policy makers.
- Business owners should occasionally consider giving their work for free. Here are several reasons why.
- GOP Governor Chris Christie wants Warren Buffett to stop talking about higher taxes on the super-rich.
- There’s a shortage of hotel rooms in London for the Olympics, so many locals are renting out their opulent private homes.
- Boston Beer will be creating a special commemorative brew, the Samuel Adams Boston 26.2, to mark this year's Boston Marathon.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
