CNBC Guest Blog
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Laouchez: Leadership in Financial Services — Missing in Action?
- Kuntz: Finding Opportunity in Emerging Markets
- Busch: How to Trade the Euro on an Outside Reversal
- Dunkelberg: The Real Banking Crisis - They're Too Big to Manage
- Greek Exit a Worse Mistake Than Adoption of Euro
- Tamminen: Waste Not, Want Not
- Morici: The Eclipse of American Banking
- Will This Decade Be More Grim Than the 1930s?
MOST SHARED
- China Rebalances Economy by Shifting Focus Inland
- China Bank Loans Pick Up After Infrastructure Push
- Greece to Leave Euro Zone on June 18: Wealth Manager
- Samsung Galaxy S3 Gets Head Start on iPhone
- Panasonic to Slash Up to 4,000 Jobs; Shares Rise
- Spain's Borrowing Costs Near Danger Level: Bailout Next?
- Greece Pours $22.6 Billion Into Four Biggest Banks
- Crude Prices Stay Firm as US Markets Reopen
- PTT Looks to Tap East African Gas via Cove Energy Bid
- European Firms Plan for Greek Unrest and Euro Exit
- A New Look at the ‘New Poor’
- Six Pack: Beer Buzz of the Week
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Big Stock Upside for Hudson City Deal: Analyst
- 5 High-Yield Stocks Ready to Boost Dividends
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- Greece Pours $22.6 Billion Into Its Four Biggest Banks
- US Markets Will Be Watching Europe—And Jobs Report
- China's Economic Rebalancing Only Geographical
- Spain's Debt Costs Near Danger Level: Is Bailout Next?
- India's Tumbling Rupee Roils Convertible Bond Market
- Samsung Galaxy S3 Gets Head Start on iPhone
- Greek Contagion Could Drag Euro Below $1.19: Charts
- Japan's Marubeni Nears $5 Billion-Plus Gavilon Deal
- European Companies Plan for Greek Unrest and Euro Exit
RSS FEED
Chadwick: This Time, the President and the Democrats are Right

Patricia Chadwick
Founder and
President
Ravengate
Partners LLC
Now is not the time to cut off unemployment benefits in this country.
Admittedly, extending the benefits will add to the Federal budget deficit, but not doing so will add to mortgage delinquencies and homelessness and will only serve to impede the still fragile recovery currently under way.
Today’s Wall Street Journal’s editorial argues that “supporting jobless benefits on compassion grounds…..keep[s] people out of the job market”. That is a simplistic notion which may carry a logical appeal, but it is neither accurate nor is it applicable in this economic environment. If that were really the case, then why have so many people given up looking for a job? How will cutting off unemployment benefits make a job miraculously appear?
It is spurious logic.
Each recession has different causes, and those causes affect the duration.
![]() |
The causes also require different solutions.
The last two recessions in this country (1990/1991 and 2001) might be termed ‘mini’ recessions.
They were of limited duration and scope, and peak unemployment was less than 8%.
The scope and impact of this recession has been the worst since the Great Depression, and the level of unemployment is unprecedented since the Depression, except for the back to back recessions of 1980 and 1982.
It seems unnecessary and tautological to state that the higher the unemployment rate, the more difficult it is to find a job. The average monthly rate of unemployment over the last 12 months has been 9.7%. There has been only one other time in the last 60 years when the level of unemployment even reached, must less was sustained at that level. That was during the inflation busting and oil crash recession of 1980 – 1982.
Patricia Chadwick
Ravengate Partners
The majority of Americans in the workforce today have not experienced a recession like this one. Many of them were either children or yet unborn in the 1980 recession. They want jobs but jobs are not to be had. They need jobs in order to put food on the table, clothe their children, pay their mortgages, reduce their debt and save for their retirement. They are looking for jobs, but the jobs aren’t there. We all know that.
This recession is slowly working its way into a sustained recovery. But it was not your ‘normal’ recession; rather it was a balance sheet recession, i.e. a recession brought about by too much debt on the part of both consumers and the banking system. The deleveraging of balance sheets is underway and that is good, but a balance sheet recovery will be slow because by its nature it impedes discretionary spending.
Extending unemployment benefits is not simply the compassionate thing to do, it is the economically responsible thing to do. Not doing so will only serve to hinder the recover now under way.
There are many ways in which the Federal Government can and must cut costs to reduce the dangerously high budget deficit. However, cutting unemployment benefits for the nearly 10% of the workforce which is trying to find a job is wrong on both moral and economic grounds.
- Jobless Rates Improve but Many Have Given Up Looking
- Slideshow - States With the Highest Unemployment Rates
- CNBC Guest Blogs: The State of Business Today
______________________________________
Patricia W. Chadwick has had more than 35 years of investment experience. She is the founder and president of Ravengate Partners LLC, a consulting firm that provides advice on financial markets and global economics.








