Go Symbol Lookup
Loading...

Fed Governor Issues Warning on Bank Dividends and Mortgage Put-Backs

 Text Size  
Published: Friday, 12 Nov 2010 | 12:07 PM ET
John Carney By:

Senior Editor, CNBC.com

If you were counting on the big U.S. banks to restore or increase dividends that were pared back or ended during the financial crisis, you might want to think again.

Getty Images
Foreclosure Sign

The final portions of a prepared speech by a top Federal Reserve official seemed aimed at pulling-back market expectations that the central bank would soon authorize a resumption of dividends.

The Fed has been preparing guidelines on how banks will be able to change their dividend policies in the first quarter of next year. When that news was reported last week—the Wall Street Journal’s headline was “Fed to Let Banks Increase Dividend” — the stocks of several banks rose.

But Fed governor Daniel Tarullo appeared to be trying to tamper the exuberance over the new Fed guidelines.

“Although the details of these guidelines are still being finalized, I can say that our approach to considering such requests will be a conservative one,” Tarullo said at a George Washington University Law School Conference on the Dodd-Frank regulatory reforms. (You can read the full speech here.)

Tarullo said that banks will need to show that they can handle risks not captured in the government’s stress tests—including the risk of put-back exposure.

“We will expect firms to submit convincing capital plans that demonstrate their ability to absorb losses over the next two years under an adverse economic scenario that we will specify, and still remain amply capitalized,” Tarullo said. “We also expect that firms will have a sound estimate of any significant risks that may not be captured by the stress testing, such as potential mortgage put-back exposures, and the capacity to absorb any consequent losses.”

The talk about dividends seems to be directly aimed at resetting—that is, lowering—expectations when it comes to dividends. Most of the speech was about Basel III capital requirements—making the dividend discussion stand out all the more. It appears to have been tacked on with the purpose of sending the market a message that many banks may not qualify for dividend hikes.

_____________________________________________________

Questions? Comments? Email us atNetNet@cnbc.com

Follow John on Twitter @ twitter.com/Carney

Follow NetNet on Twitter @ twitter.com/CNBCnetnet

Facebook us @ www.facebook.com/NetNetCNBC

 Print
If you were counting on the big U.S. banks to restore or increase dividends that were pared back or ended during the financial crisis, you might want to think again.

   
Comments

 

More Comments

 
 

Add Comments

 

Your Comments (Up to 1100 characters):

Remaining characters

Your comments have not been posted yet.

Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments:


                
            
            
        

Featured

Contact NetNet

  • Senior Editor covering Wall Street, hedge funds, financial regulation and other business news.

  • Senior writer for CNBC.com, covering the gamut of issues affecting the stock market and the economy.

  • Stephanie Landsman is the line producer of CNBC's 5pm ET show "Fast Money."

Subscribe

Wall Street