![]()
- JPMorgan Sells Good Assets to Offset 'London Whale'
- Roubini’s Das: Spain Needs a Bailout ‘Sooner or Later’
- Euro Isn’t Loved, but Few in Europe Want to Drop It: Poll
- Madoff Case Is Paying Off for Trustee ($850 an Hour)
- Ackman: JCPenney's Latest Sales Plunge Is a 'Bottom'

- Which Policies Could Hold Back US Growth?
- Cool Jobs: From Gold Stacker to Bed Tester
- Greece Pours $22.6 Billion Into Its Four Biggest Banks
- As Irish Head to Polls, ‘No’ Voices Get Louder
MOST SHARED
- Madoff Case Is Paying Off for Trustee ($850 an Hour)
- ‘Shadow Banking’ Shrinking on Regulatory Scrutiny: Report
- China Big Four Banks a Huge Buying Opportunity: Goldman
- Shares to Open Higher; Investor Focus Turns Home
- Option Bulls Dig Into Ivanhoe Near Lows
- Don't Buy Hon Hai Shares on Apple TV Rumors: Analyst
- Greece to Leave Euro Zone on June 18: Wealth Manager
- Euro Zone Bank Safety Net Leaves Holes Unplugged
- Buffett-Backed BYD Defends Electric Car After Accident
- US Law Firm Dewey Files for Chapter 11, Seeks Liquidation
Lame Duck Priorities: Taxes and Nukes
Americans were watching closely for signs about how much tax they will pay in coming years as the lame duck Congress convenes this week for a last session before the new Republican majority takes control of the House of Representatives.
Clearly the most divisive issue separating Democrats and Republicans is tax policy, which dominated U.S. politics throughout the congressional election campaign.
Pounding a message that promised smaller government and low taxes, Republicans and their tea party allies delivered a crushing blow to Obama and his Democrats.
At issue are tax cuts passed under Bush in 2001 and 2003 but set to expire on Dec. 31.
Obama wants Congress to make permanent the breaks for Americans who make less than $200,000 for individuals or $250,000 for couples, while letting expire cuts for people who earn more than those amounts.
Republicans want to keep the reduced tax rates in place for all Americans.
![]() |
Jewel Samad | AFP | Getty Images President Barack Obama delivers a statement on the US economy to the press in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, DC, on September 15, 2010. |
Obama on Sunday reiterated his opposition to a permanent extension of current tax rates for high-income individuals.
"It won't significantly boost the economy, and it's hugely expensive," he told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to Washington from an Asia trip.
"So we can't afford it." He acknowledged, though, that Republicans have "some strong feelings" about making the tax cuts for the wealthy permanent.
"If they feel very strongly about it, then I want to get a sense of ... how they intend to pay for it," Obama said.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has introduced legislation that would permanently extend the current tax rates for all income levels, but on Sunday signaled an openness to negotiate.
"I'm willing to listen to what the president has in mind for protecting Americans from tax increases," McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said in a statement.
Two prominent Republicans conceded on Sunday that the best Congress might be able to accomplish in the coming weeks was a short term-continuation of the current tax rates.
"If the president wants to compromise on a two- or three-year extension ... if that's all we can get out of the president, and he is the president, so we'll work with him on that," said Sen. Jim DeMint, a South Carolina Republican and a leader of his party's conservative wing.
Likewise, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the Republican presidential contender in 2008, said he could fathom a short-term extension of all the tax cuts.
McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts, saying they disproportionately benefited wealthy Americans and did not rein spending.
"They should be extended until we are out of this recession," McCain said. "At such time we can look at other tax hikes. But when we're in a serious recession I cannot believe that raising taxes is a good thing on anybody."
The recession officially ended in June 2009, but the recovery has been markedly slow, with unemployment stuck at 9.6 percent.
What is more important for the larger world is Senate ratification of a new START arms pact with Russia.
The new nuclear arms reduction treaty, signed by President Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev in April, still has not been ratified by the Senate as required by the Constitution.
The pact must receive 67 votes in the 100-seat Senate.








