Go Symbol Lookup
Loading...

Regulators See Danger in New Risk-Retention Rules

 Text Size  
Published: Tuesday, 18 Jan 2011 | 4:31 PM ET
By: Reuters

New risk retention standards could restrict the availability of credit and hurt the economy if not carefully written, according to a report released on Tuesday by a new council of US regulators.

The council also said the new standards could reduce the kind of volatility in the asset-backed securities market that occurred during the 2007 to 2009 financial crisis when the housing market collapsed.

The Financial Stability Oversight Council, which is led by the Treasury Department and includes representatives from all the major financial regulators, was required to issue the report by the new Dodd-Frank financial reform law.

The study said asking lenders to retain some risk from the loans they originate may help lead to better lending decisions and mitigate some of the "pro-cyclical" effects from securitization that can lead to market bubbles.

"However, if overly restrictive, risk retention could constrain the formation of credit, which could adversely impact economic growth," the study said. "The challenge is to design a risk retention framework that maximizes benefits while minimizing its costs,"

Regulators are currently wrestling with how to best implement a new risk retention regulation that will force loan originators and securitizers to retain in their portfolios at least 5 percent of the value of loans, rather than shifting all of the risk to investors as the debt gets resold. Certain mortgages could escape this requirement.

 Print
New risk retention standards could restrict the availability of credit and hurt the economy if not carefully written, according to a report released on Tuesday by a new council of US regulators.

   
Comments

 

More Comments

 
 

Add Comments

 

Your Comments (Up to 1100 characters):

Remaining characters

Your comments have not been posted yet.

Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments: