Skip navigation


Current DateTime: 03:58:52 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 35816813

Current DateTime: 03:58:52 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23452764
Expiration DateTime: 2/23/2012 4:00:24 AM

MOST SHARED


Current DateTime: 03:58:52 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 31330905
Expiration DateTime: 2/23/2012 4:00:45 AM

MOST POPULAR


Current DateTime: 03:58:52 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 35819650
    • ETF Strategist | Fixed Income

        Exchange-traded funds are hot, but are they right four your portfolio? Learn the pros and cons of various asset classes and sectors.

HOT ON FACEBOOK

Speed Is Key for Railroads, Ports in 'Post-Panamax' Era

Published: Friday, 25 Feb 2011 | 5:53 PM ET
Text Size
By: Mia Lamar
Special to CNBC.com

Nearly 100 years ago, the Panama Canal hosted its first passage, a watershed event that has influenced the landscape of shipping and transportation ever since. Now, the canal is due to rattle international trade once more, potentially reshaping the way sea-borne shipping and rail lines tackle business in the world’s largest consumer nation.

Source: E.R. Schiffahrt
Massive "Post-Panamax" vessels, like the one pictured here, will be able to cross the Panama Canal when its expansion wraps in 2014.

A massive, $5 billion-plus expansion of the canal looks on track to wrap in 2014, just in time for the waterway's centennial. The expansion will allow the passage of larger, so-called “Post-Panamax” vessels that can haul roughly double the cargo of ships that currently fit the canal.

Importantly, the expansion will also give ship lines around the world, particularly those with massive container ships, yet another route for moving goods to the United States.

For corporations shipping goods to the U.S., the often cheaper option of crossing through the canal could prove too good to pass up.

“It is more expensive for the container line ship to move a box from Los Angeles to Chicago by rail then it is for the line to move the box from Shanghai to Los Angeles,” said Tom Finkbiner, senior chairman of the board of the Intermodal Transportation Institute and a former intermodal executive at Norfolk Southern.

This means the expansion project is high on the radar of a wide range of players in U.S. shipping and transportation, from the country’s busiest port—the Port of Los Angeles—to the rail companies and intermodal players that support the ports and the constant flow in and out of them.

Fewer containers moving from Asia through the Port of LA, for example, will likely impact a railway like Warren Buffet's Burlington Northern Santa Fe [BRK'A  Loading...      ()   ], though the company downplays that possibility.

"We don't think at this point it will have a huge impact," BNSF executive vice president and chief marketing officer John Lanigan said in a recent interview with CNBC.com. "It won't add to our business because of the opening," he added. "It will potentially detract from our business."

Burlington Northern serves all container ports on the West Coast and the Texas Gulf Coast. Close ties with ports like Los Angeles and Long Beach, a pair which accommodated more than 40 percent of all twenty-foot container units (TEUs) imported into the United States in 2009, will support the railway post-expansion, Lanigan said.

“Obviously our interest is in freights…that don’t come through the Panama Canal,” he said. “We’re ready to compete from movements that want to go all-water.”

“All-water” routes call directly to the U.S. East Coast, skipping West Coast ports and the cross-country intermodal system composed of trucks and railways like BNSF. Fraught with oversupply, container lines around the world have been offering dirt-cheap rates. This has led to an interesting conundrum for shippers weighing the costs of moving goods to critical centers like Chicago and New York.

Christian Wetherbee, a senior transportation analyst for Citigroup, notes that rates for container ships have fallen “significantly,” while “rail rates have gone nothing but up.”

Speed

Parties like BNSF’s Lanigan, however, dispute any true cost advantage of shipping through the canal, while also noting the West’s prime advantage: speed.

“It’s absolutely quicker to go to the West Coast,” Lanigan said, adding that it’s also “indisputed that freight gets to the inland faster.”

Estimates of shipping times vary across the industry; Finkbiner estimates that a haul shipped on the Pacific Ocean and railed to Chicago would take roughly 14-15 days, while the same haul routed through the Port of New York would take closer to 25-28 days.

At the Port of Los Angeles, senior director of communications Arley Baker said he is confident the speed to market offered by the West Coast ports and intermodal system will remain a “top priority” for shippers.

“We can hit middle America days sooner than an all-water route would,” Baker said.



Current DateTime: 01:25:37 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 03:38:30 22 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 03:58:30 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779197

Current DateTime: 02:40:55 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779199
CNBCCNBC
About CNBC  |  Site Map  |  Video Reprints   |  Advertise  |  Help  |  Contact
Privacy Policy  |     |  Terms of Service  |  Independent Programming Report
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2012 CNBC LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBCUniversal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters