Net
- Economy's Biggest Drag Right Now Is Government
- What’s This ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Anyway? Do I Need to Worry?
- What Falling Milk Prices Say About an Economic Slowdown
- Bad Day for BATS—and for High-Frequency Trading
- Obamacare, the Individual Mandate and MMT
- A Defense of Crony Capitalism
- The Buckaroo and the Demand for Money
- New York Housing Market Could Still Collapse: Analyst
- Why the Social Security Tax Fight Is Stupid
- Big Shift in ECB Balance Sheet a Sign of Banking Stress?
- Bringing the Poppy Back to Wall Street
- Carl Icahn Increases Stake in Chesapeake, Demands Board Seats
- Kansas City Fed President Steps Into Jamie Dimon Debate
- Where Large Banks Fail, Regionals are Succeeding: Bove
- Facebook IPO Fiasco: 10 Things Underwriters Got Wrong
- Bank of Greece Poised to Reveal Crucial Data
- Rumors of Bank Intervention Stir Euro Markets
- Last Call: Facebook Fiasco Is Heading Toward Farce
- How to Get Fired From Goldman Sachs
- Why Facebook Stock May Have Hit a Bottom
- Facebook Forecast Scandal's Big Question: Insider Trading?
- Last Call: Facebook IPO Forensic Examination Begins
- Case Against JPM Is 'Straightforward': Attorney
- JPMorgan Facing 2007 'Kitchen Sink' Times Again?
- Bill Ackman's J.C. Penney Presentation from Ira Sohn Conference
Call: 201-735-4638
Text Message: 917-740-8477
- Manufacturing May Be Poised for a Quantum Leap
- Spain to Go to Market to Fund Banks, Regions
- Home Prices Hit Fresh Lows, But 'We See Signs of Hope'
- JPMorgan Implicated in Japan's Insider Trading Probe
- Cramer's Top Dividend Plays
- Why June Could Be a Turning Point for Markets
- BlackBerry Maker RIM Hires Advisers to Review Business
- Facebook Faces Extended US Review of Instagram Deal
- Shares of Facebook Fall Below $29 for First Time
- High-Tech Worker Shortage: Has Anything Changed?
Obama's Jobs Bill Might Cause a Recession
Senior Editor, CNBC.com
![]() |
CNBC.com |
It may even wind up pushing us into a recession
because, ironically, it is way too serious and responsible.
The plan is to have the government spend more and tax less, adding around $450 billion into the economy. On paper, this seems like a pretty good idea.
But then you have to write the word “reflexivity” across the top of your paper and start figuring out how people and businesses will react to the new spending.
If people believe that the spending will result in higher taxes, they’ll save more in anticipation of the taxes. They may save more than the government spends, which is why the jobs plan could lead to economic contraction.
This over-saving is not entirely irrational. People are used to government programs costing more than expected. So when told the price tag for a bill is $450 billion, the expect the actual price tag to be well above $500 billion. If they save in anticipation of the higher price tag—while spending doesn’t actually exceed projections—you get a drop in aggregate demand.
The only way a plan like this could work well would be for people to believe that the government will not act “responsibly” and raise taxes to meet its obligations. If they thought that the government would inflate the debt away, they’d spend more now to avoid holding dollars that were about to lose purchasing power. This would actually create a multiplier effect.
But last night in his speech, Obama went out of his way to reassure the American people that his plan was fully “paid for.” Americans hearing that news will likely react by increasing their savings to accommodate higher taxes that will “pay for” the bill.
Although you’ll likely hear that it Republican resistance to spending that prevents stimulus from working, it’s also the Democratic attachment to raising taxes that undermines attempts at economic stimulus.
Questions? Comments? Email us at
Follow John on Twitter @ twitter.com/Carney
Follow NetNet on Twitter @ twitter.com/CNBCnetnet
Facebook us @ www.facebook.com/NetNetCNBC















