GO
Loading...

Enter multiple symbols separated by commas

Sugar Industry Suing Corn Refiners Over Ad Claims

What is "sugar"? What is "natural"?

These two questions are at the heart of a multi-million dollar lawsuit brought by Big Sugar against Big Corn.

corn_200.jpg
Eri Morita | Riser | Getty Images

High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) has long been the sweetener of choice for the U.S. soda market, but as public debate over obesity heated up, consumers started to sour on syrup. So the Corn Refiners Association (CRA) launched a public-service campaign to convince consumers that HFCS is "natural" and no different from sugar. "Sugar is sugar," CRA's spokeswoman has said.

No, it's not, according to the Western Sugar Cooperative and other sugar-beet and sugar-cane farmers. They call the HFCS campaign "food identity theft." They're suing the CRA and members Archers Daniel Midland and Cargill for false advertising, claiming the estimated $50 million campaign has illegally damaged the sugar business.

There is no FDA definition for "natural," though there is one for sugar, or sucrose. Tuesday, in court, the CRA asked federal judge Consuelo Marshall to dismiss the case, arguing that its campaign to promote HFCS is protected speech, not commercial speech, since they are an industry association, not a business. Attorney Dan Webb says the sugar lobby is "attempting to stifle debate" about whether or not HFCS contributes to obesity.

This is not the first time sugar farmers have sued over a product claiming to be natural and just like sugar. The same cooperative sued the makers of Splenda in 2008, a suit later settled out of court. When asked why sugar farmers feel the need to sue rivals, their attorney, Adam Fox, points out they only sue when they believe there's misinformation. "We haven't sued the makers of honey for calling itself 'natural'."

The current economics, however, may favor corn over sugar. Stephens, Inc. says HFCS prices are up 9.4 percent in a year, but sugar prices are up 41.7 percent. Bradley Safalow at PAA Research says, "The vilification of high-fructose corn syrup has sparked a surge in demand for products made with refined sugar," leading to tight supplies and perhaps making corn more attractive to food manufacturers.

Still, sugar wants corn to pay. Attorney Adam Fox estimates that every penny-per-pound of business lost to HFCS costs sugar farmers $160 million. Meantime, the corn industry is petitioning the FDA to rename High Fructose Corn Syrup "corn sugar."

Contact U.S. News

  • CNBC NEWSLETTERS

    Get the best of CNBC in your inbox

    Please choose a subscription

    Please enter a valid email address
    To learn more about how we use your information,
    please read our Privacy Policy.

Don't Miss

  • Why women cheat?

    Is cheating bad? Why do women cheat? The founder and CEO of affair website Ashley Madison tells all, including why he has his eye on China.

  • Judge's gavel

    The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority disciplined several financial services firms and individuals in May 2015.

  • Fine wines & finance

    Why you should try something a little different on date night. Bring the romance and champagne, and a calculator too. Every once in a while have a date to talk money and finance, and keep an important part of your relationship on track. Reporter Sharon Epperson talks to a couple who does just that.

U.S. Video

  • Cramer: Here's a sign the market could rally

    Wall Street's been soaking in red, but "Mad Money" host Jim Cramer has one signal to watch for that could point to another run.

  • Burger war maneuvers

    Cramer looks at the number of company's selling burgers and tries to determine the quality names, as well as those to avoid.

  • Cramer: What's driving defense?

    Cramer says that even though President Obama has made it clear the US can no longer be the world's policeman, the country can become the world's arms dealer. Profiting from defense spending.