Skip navigation

Realty Check

#DIANAOLICK ON TWITTER


Current DateTime: 12:07:55 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23279692
Expiration DateTime: 2/23/2012 12:09:52 AM

Current DateTime: 12:07:55 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 35933407
  • The 10 Emptiest US Cities

      It’s no secret that the U.S. housing market has seen better days. So, what are the emptiest major U.S. cities?

  • Most Expensive States

      Your dollar won't get as far in these ten states. Which states are the most expensive to live in?

  • Inspired Homes

      From the Simpsons TV show, to the White House to Snow White, here are homes inspired by others.

MOST SHARED


Current DateTime: 12:07:55 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 31330905
Expiration DateTime: 2/23/2012 12:09:45 AM

Current DateTime: 12:07:55 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23452000
Expiration DateTime: 2/23/2012 12:09:40 AM

Current DateTime: 12:07:55 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23452764
Expiration DateTime: 2/23/2012 12:09:24 AM

REALTY CHECK VIDEO

» More

Current DateTime: 12:07:55 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 30871294
Expiration DateTime: 2/23/2012 12:09:34 AM

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 12:07:55 23 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 30871303

Half of US Mortgages Are Effectively Underwater

Published: Tuesday, 8 Nov 2011 | 5:45 PM ET
Text Size
By: Diana Olick
CNBC Real Estate Reporter

A new report on still-falling home prices today highlights the fact that the lower those prices go, the more American borrowers fall into an negative equity position; that is, they owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth.
Getty Images

Most analysts will tell you that negative equity is the number one problem in the housing market today, even worse than foreclosures, because it causes foreclosures, stymies consumer spending and traps potential home buyers and sellers in place.

Negative equity rose to 28.6 percent of single-family homes with mortgages in the third quarter of this year, according to Zillow. That's up from 26.8 percent in the second quarter. In real terms, that's 14.6 million borrowers.

Many of those borrowers are already behind on their mortgage payments, and some are likely already in the foreclosure process. The rest of them are in danger of defaulting, not because they can't pay their mortgages, but because they either won't want to (seeing as they will never see any real appreciation in their investment) or because any change in their economic or personal situation might force them into default (change of job, divorce).

While 14.6 million might seem like a lot, it's not the real number when you consider negative equity in housing's recovery. That's because it doesn't factor in "effective" negative equity, which is borrowers who have so little equity in their homes that they cannot afford to move.

Consider the following from mortgage analyst Mark Hanson:

On US totals, if you figure average house prices use conforming loan balances, then a repeat buyer has to have roughly 10 percent down to buy in addition to the 6 percent Realtor fee to sell. Thus, the effective negative equity target would be 85%. You also have to factor in secondary financing, which most measures leave out.

Based on that, over 50 percent of all mortgaged households in the US are effectively underwater — unable to sell for enough to pay a Realtor and put a down payment on a new purchase without coming out of pocket. Because repeat buyers have always carried the market as the foundation, this is why demand has not come back. It's as if half the potential buyers in America died over a two-year period of time.

The foreclosure crisis grabs most of the media attention these days, but in order for housing to recover, the market needs to see activity.

It's as simple as buying and selling. Negative and effective negative equity are causing stagnation, which may in the end be far more detrimental than foreclosures. The argument to solve this problem is principal forgiveness, and it is gaining traction politically and somewhat less in the banking sector.

Principal forgiveness, or lowering the balance of a large chunk of the nation's mortgages, would be costly at best but could be catastrophic at worst. "Those thinking principal reductions are a panacea have never originated a loan, done the street level research, and do not really know the borrowers behind their data," argues Hanson. "More than likely it would create a far greater number of new strategic defaulters than the number it would legitimately save from Foreclosure."

Questions?  Comments?  And follow me on Twitter @Diana_Olick

© 2012 CNBC.com


Current DateTime: 01:18:34 22 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 03:38:30 22 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 12:30:55 22 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779197

Current DateTime: 09:06:38 22 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779199
CNBCCNBC
About CNBC  |  Site Map  |  Video Reprints   |  Advertise  |  Help  |  Contact
Privacy Policy  |     |  Terms of Service  |  Independent Programming Report
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2012 CNBC LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBCUniversal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters