Net
- Economy's Biggest Drag Right Now Is Government
- What’s This ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Anyway? Do I Need to Worry?
- What Falling Milk Prices Say About an Economic Slowdown
- Bad Day for BATS—and for High-Frequency Trading
- Obamacare, the Individual Mandate and MMT
- A Defense of Crony Capitalism
- The Buckaroo and the Demand for Money
- New York Housing Market Could Still Collapse: Analyst
- Why the Social Security Tax Fight Is Stupid
- Last Call: RIM Keeps Playing Through the Heavy Stuff
- Big Shift in ECB Balance Sheet a Sign of Banking Stress?
- Bringing the Poppy Back to Wall Street
- Carl Icahn Increases Stake in Chesapeake, Demands Board Seats
- Kansas City Fed President Steps Into Jamie Dimon Debate
- Where Large Banks Fail, Regionals are Succeeding: Bove
- Facebook IPO Fiasco: 10 Things Underwriters Got Wrong
- Bank of Greece Poised to Reveal Crucial Data
- Rumors of Bank Intervention Stir Euro Markets
- Last Call: Facebook Fiasco Is Heading Toward Farce
- How to Get Fired From Goldman Sachs
- Why Facebook Stock May Have Hit a Bottom
- Facebook Forecast Scandal's Big Question: Insider Trading?
- Last Call: Facebook IPO Forensic Examination Begins
- Case Against JPM Is 'Straightforward': Attorney
- JPMorgan Facing 2007 'Kitchen Sink' Times Again?
Call: 201-735-4638
Text Message: 917-740-8477
- Most of the Aid Sent to Athens Circles Right Back to Europe
- Asia's Message to Europe: Bite the Austerity Bullet
- Madrid in ‘Game of Chicken’ With European Union
- More Trump Birther Remarks Overshadow Romney
- Sun to Set on Commodities Super-Cycle: Strategist
- Big Money: Rockefellers and Rothschilds Unite
- ECB Rejects Madrid Plan to Boost Troubled Bankia
- Why I Fell Out of Love with My BlackBerry
- Crisis-Battered Greek Banks Set for Weak Quarter
- Detroit: From Urban Blight to Tech Might
Fed: How Fannie and Freddie Are Hurting the Housing Market
Senior Editor, CNBC.com
![]() |
Tetra Images | Getty Images United States Federal Reserve |
There’s a lot in there to digest so I’ll be picking out points and writing up posts as I go through it.
One point that shows up early on in the Fed’s analysis is that lenders are hesitating to make home loans even when they face no credit risk because the loans are eligible for guarantees from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Why aren’t banks making these “safe” loans? The Fed
cites three reasons: 1) mortgage servicing costs in the post-robo signing era, 2) uncertainty over the capital treatment mortgages will get under Basel III, and 3) the put-back lawsuits filed by the GSE.
Lenders’ reaction to the possibility of forced repurchases highlights the tradeoff between the GSEs pursuing a policy of reducing their near-term losses and risk exposure versus adopting policies to support the broader housing market. Aggressively putting back delinquent loans to lenders helps the GSEs maximize their profits on old business and thus limits their draws on the U.S. Treasury, but at the same time, it discourages lenders from originating new mortgages. Meanwhile, for loans that are ineligible for GSE purchase, only high-credit-score borrowers generally have access to financing, and lenders often keep these loans in portfolio, leading them to be selective about the volume of such loans they originate.
To put it slightly differently, what the Fed is arguing is that making banks follow the rules for mortgage lending results in far less lending.
We want banks to be more diligent about reviewing loan delinquency filings. We want them not to foist losses off on the taxpayer through the GSE’s. We want stricter capital requirements.
As it turns out, we cannot get these things without paying for them in the form of far less mortgage lending.
Questions? Comments? Email us at
Follow John on Twitter @ twitter.com/Carney
Follow NetNet on Twitter @ twitter.com/CNBCnetnet
Facebook us @ www.facebook.com/NetNetCNBC















