Some tech celebrities, of course, are known for being flashy. Both Lawrence J. Ellison, chief executive of Oracle, and Sean Parker, an early Facebook executive, have storied, lavish lifestyles. But there are many more who stick with the conceit of understatement. Jack Dorsey, a co-founder of Twitter, favors $1,200 bespoke jeans from a designer called 3x1, with the subtle button logo. And Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook’s chief operating officer, is building a house in exclusive Menlo Park — much of it underground, hidden from view.
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief executive, sets the tone at the company with his trademark rumpled hoodies that display no obvious brand name. He spent $7 million on a large but nondescript home in Palo Alto, a suburb so expensive that even a small, no-frills house easily goes for $1.5 million these days.
In a letter to would-be shareholders when the company filed to go public, Mr. Zuckerberg summed up his corporate philosophy this way: “Simply put, we don’t build services to make money; we make money to build better services.”
Although he has not articulated it with an office memo or a baseball bat, it is understood, say Facebook employees and their friends, that Mr. Zuckerberg would find it uncool for one of his underlings to drive a Lamborghini to the office.
“It’s almost an unspoken rule: spend your money, but do it privately,” said one person who knows Mr. Zuckerberg and others at Facebook socially but did not want to be named before the offering.
Andrew Rachleff, a former venture capitalist turned wealth manager, estimates that the Facebook offering will create somewhere around 1,000 millionaires, most of whom will make something in the $2 million to $5 million range. Much of the money he has gathered so far for his company, called Wealthfront, is from young techies at firms like Google, LinkedIn and Facebook, which ahead of its public offering has allowed employees to sell shares on secondary markets.
Mr. Rachleff’s aim is to reach out to that Valley demographic — young, good at math, uncomfortable with professional money managers — and make their money grow. He has already run into one glitch: “They all hate that word, ‘wealth.’ If there was one thing I’d change, it would be our name.” (The company’s previous name, Ka-ching, as in the sound of an old-fashioned cash register, seems to have been just as ill-chosen.)
The two counties that make up Silicon Valley have some of the highest concentrations of wealth in the country, and the share of wealthy households is growing, according to the census. Nearly 14 percent of all households in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties earn more than $200,000 a year, just below the 16 percent of households in Manhattan.
Still, one of the parlor games here is the effort by many to distinguish themselves from the much maligned coterie of bankers and other members of the 1 percent in places like New York and Boston. Wingtips and silk ties are rare. Cycling and kite-boarding are preferred over golf.
Bill Gurley, a venture capitalist in Menlo Park, tells what happened when he began working as a Wall Street analyst in Manhattan in 1993, fresh out of business school. A colleague turned his tie over to check the label. “My first day at work,” Mr. Gurley recalled, “I was told to replace all my ties with Hermès and never to wear brown shoes again.”
He did not heed the advice. Nor did he last long on Wall Street. He is a partner now at Benchmark Capital, which recently profited handsomely from Facebook’s $1 billion acquisition of Instagram.
Quentin Hardy and Nick Bilton contributed reporting.