Go Symbol Lookup
Loading...

Dow Reaches New All-Time High; Home Depot, JPMorgan Lead

Standard Chartered's Penalty Not Severe Enough: Fmr. Ambassador

 Text Size  
Published: Tuesday, 14 Aug 2012 | 4:44 PM ET
Jason Gewirtz By:

Senior Producer

Getty Images

Minutes after New York State’s Department of Financial Services announced a $340 million settlement with British bank Standard Chartered for doing business in Iran, the main lobby group pushing for increased sanctions against anyone doing business with the Islamic Republic issued a statement of its own on Tuesday.

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mark Wallace, CEO of United Against a Nuclear Iran, said “given the reports of Standard Chartered’s egregious actions the penalty should have been more severe.” (Read More: Standard Chartered to Pay $340 Million Over Iran Case.)

Benjamin Lawsky, the head of New York’s Department of Financial Services accused Standard Chartered of conducting “60,000 secret transactions, involving at least $250 billion and reaping millions of dollars in fees” from its Iranian business ties. The New York DFS also said executives at Standard Chartered lied to them about their dealings with Iran.

Should Standard Chartered Lose Its NY License?
Ambassador Mark Wallace, United Against a Nuclear Iran, offers insight on sanctions against Iran and whether they are working.

Before the Department of Financial Services announced the settlement Wallace appeared on CNBC's "Power Lunch."

“This is no time for a slap on the wrist," he said. "We think they should get the equivalent of the financial death penalty — meaning losing their license to do business in the United States and New York.”

Wallace and his group are calling for a “complete and total economic blockade of Iran.”

Standard Chartered’s records indicate the bank had operating income of $17 billion dollars in 2011. Critics of settlements with other banks and businesses in similar cases claim millions in fines for companies making billions of dollars isn’t the right message to send.

Many members of congress and in the diplomatic community have been arguing companies like Standard Chartered should be forced to make a choice: Do business in the United States or in Iran, but not in both.

It’s still unclear if Standard Chartered will have to deal with federal consequences as well.

—By CNBC's Jason Gewirtz

 Print
Minutes after New York State’s Department of Financial Services announced a $340 million settlement with British bank Standard Chartered for doing business in Iran, the main lobby group pushing for increased sanctions against anyone doing business with the Islamic Republic issued a statement of its own.

   
Comments

 

More Comments

 
 

Add Comments

 

Your Comments (Up to 1100 characters):

Remaining characters

Your comments have not been posted yet.

Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments:


                
            
            
        

Featured

U.S. Video

  • Vodafone's revenue fell 4.2 percent for the year that ended March 31, reports CNBC's David Faber. The "Squawk on the Street" crew discuss what this means for Verizon, who expressed interest in buying Vodafone's 45 percent stake in its company.

  • Jim Cramer explains what to watch ahead of the open. Earnings news from Home Depot and Best Buy sent both retailers in opposite directions.

  • JPMorgan Chase has narrowly defeated its non-binding proposal to split the Chairman & CEO roles at the bank, reports CNBC's Kayla Tausche.