The US Economy and the Future of Growth: Well This Is Depressing

Thomas Mucha
Wednesday, 29 Aug 2012 | 1:57 AM ET

The United States has produced one of the most successful economic stories in human history.

We've had a lot of inherent advantages: abundant natural resources, favorable demographic trends, relative political stability supported by the protective benefit of two oceans, to name a few.

But from colonial times to the present, our happy economy has also been powered by three separate industrial revolutions: 1) the introduction of steam engines and railroads, 2) the inception and widespread use of electricity and the combustion engine, and 3) the invention of computers, the web and mobile communications.

As Northwestern economist Robert Gordon points out in a new paper, these three interlocking events gave rise to a widespread assumption that "economic growth is a continuous process that will persist forever."

That's because each of these industrial revolutions produced a virtuous economic circle.

Each advance built upon the innovations of the previous ones, along the way boosting productivity and revving the American economy, which in turn made American consumers richer and more able to buy stuff.

Well, guess what? Gordon writes that future growth in consumption per capita — the main engine of the consumer-based US economy — could fall below 0.5 percent a year for what he calls "an extended period of decades."

Yes, that would be a big deal. For some context, between 1860 and 2007 that annual growth rate was 1.9 percent.

What's driving this structural economic slowdown, according to Gordon?

He argues that six "headwinds" are buffeting the US economy, and that these factors were in place even before the Great Recession of 2008.

Count 'em: 1) changing and unfavorable demographics, 2) rising education costs and poor secondary school performance, 3) growing economic inequality, 4) increased competition due to globalization, 5) energy and environmental costs and challenges, and 6) high levels of consumer and government debt.

Taken together, these headwinds will slow growth dramatically into the foreseeable future.

Here's the money quote of Gordon's paper, which is titled "Is U.S. Economic Growth Over? Faltering Innovation Confronts the Six Headwinds":

“Doubling the standard of living took five centuries between 1300 and 1800. Doubling accelerated to one century between 1800 and 1900. Doubling peaked at a mere 28 years between 1929 and 1957 and 31 years between 1957 and 1988. But then doubling is predicted to slow back to a century again between 2007 and 2100.”

This slowdown is happening because the productivity gains associated with computers and mobility have been far less dramatic — at least so far — than the two previous industrial revolutions, all of which leads Gordon to his depressing theme: "Economic growth may not be a continuous long-run process that lasts forever."

Yeah, it's bleak. But as Annie Lowrie points out in the Economix blog, not everyone agrees.

For a more upbeat view of our economic future — particularly on the relationship between emerging technologies and productivity gains — see this article, The Next Great Growth Cycle.

Here's the paper's money quote from author Mark P. Mills:

"We are poised to enter a new era that will come from the convergence of three technological transformations that have already happened: Big Data, the Wireless Wired World, and Computational Manufacturing."

Mills also quotes, in a reassuring way, John Perry Barlow, the co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and, yes, former Grateful Dead lyricist: “The best way to invent the future is to predict it.”

And on the topic of famous quotes, we might also point to John Maynard Keynes' legendary quip: "In the long run, we're all dead."

Or maybe we should just take comfort in the words attributed variously to Danish physicist Niels Bohr and the wise sage Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra: "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future."


  • Pro-Russian activists seized the main administration building in the eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk.

    Deadly clashes in eastern Ukraine have spiked fears of all-out war in the region. So who are the armed, flag-waving rebels who appear to be behind it all?

  • An employee wipes a TV screen in a shop in Moscow, on April 17, 2014, during the broadcast of President Vladimir Putin's televised question and answer session with the nation.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin warned of possible disruption to Europe's gas supply on Thursday, as the U.S. confirmed it would send additional military support to Ukraine.

  • The recovery in the EU's car industry carried on through March, providing some much needed cheer for automakers.

  • Amazon is facing fresh strikes in Germany after pay negotiations with the country's second-largest union Ver.di broke down, the Financial Times reports.

Contact Europe News


    Get the best of CNBC in your inbox

    › Learn More

Europe Video

  • Jan Dunning, CEO of St Petersburg-headquartered hypermarket chain Lenta, says the situation in Ukraine has had no impact on the group, as consumer confidence remains unaffected in Russia.

  • Vincent Deluard, European strategist at Ned Davis Research Group, says the strong euro is a problem for the region's companies, especially for the large exporters.

  • European shares closed higher on Thursday as investors brushed aside concerns regarding Ukraine and focused instead on Wall Street earnings and the latest U.S. jobs data.