, Twitter trumps Facebook as the most sustainable and useful social network.
While I think Facebook will ultimately die, it can do several things to make its time on Earth more pleasant and profitable.
Evolution is a double-edged sword. On one hand, you must innovate or die (bicycle company Specialized rarely gets credit for using that phrase). On the other, evolving for innovation’s sake or, worse yet, evolving because you’re not really exactly sure what you are in the first place, portends problems.
I do not propose cosmetic changes to Facebook. Or the addition of features that redirect the user experience, such as the controversial timeline. At least on the desktop, Facebook should have never veered too far from its original incarnation.
Instead, I suggest strategic shifts, some of which are already in place.
1. Focus on being a destination for entertainment, such as gaming, fantasy sports pools, photo sharing, and such. Stop trying to do the things Twitter does so well. Facebook cannot succeed, long-term, as a competitor to Twitter in areas such as news, information, and casual networking.
2. Abandon news-sharing partnerships with Yahoo and The Washington Post. Again, Twitter already performs this function — quite well and mostly on an informal basis. Trying to link Yahoo and WaPo accounts with the reader’s Facebook account only annoys users and perpetuates privacy concerns.
3. Crush the competition. Stop buying it. I can see the sense in the Instagram acquisition. Here’s a company that not only burst onto, but dominated the photo-sharing scene. Facebook pulled a competitive block.
That however needs to be the exception. If you want talent, hire a headhunter and poach it. The notion of buying an entire company for its creative staff smacks of a poor use of cash to me.
4. Don’t make hardware. You’re not Amazon.com. And you have no viable reason to make it look like you’re competing with Apple.
Jeff Bezos conceived Kindle Fire as a way to drive sales and bring more people into the Amazon ecosystem. We now know that was an achievable goal. It had nothing to do with competing with any other hardware maker, particularly Apple. (Read More:
Mark Zuckerberg does not have as sound of a strategy. Creating a smartphone, for example, to make Facebook the platform as opposed to “just an app” has no chance of succeeding. To his credit, Zuck says he has no plans for a phone, but who knows what to believe?
5. Pick Bezos’s brain. While I think it’s great that Zuckerberg and Washington Post CEO Don Graham have become friends, Facebook needs to roll with perpetual startups.
Why partner with a dying breed — once again, in an area Twitter continues to dominate and disrupt? Instead, Facebook should collaborate with and learn from more relevant leaders in the new media space.
Not only can Bezos relay wisdom to Zuckerberg, he might even be open to an e-commerce partnership. This could drive revenue for both companies and provide Facebook with broader, but still appropriate appeal.
Along the same lines, why make ankle-biter Spotify a partner in music discovery? You’re apparently having trouble monetizing mobile, work something out with the leader in that area as well as Internet radio, Pandora Media. If they won’t do a deal, sit back, but don’t settle.
In some ways, Facebook reminds me of Yahoo.
Tons of revenue. Fantastic brand recognition. Loads of users around the world. Yet, there appears to be a lack of focus.
The Zuckerberg mission — to make the world more open and connected — sounds great, but is it really sustainable? And, really, what does it mean? The various components of that mission — such as connect with your friends and express yourself — come off as imprecise.
Very Yahoo-like indeed. Sheryl Sandberg and Marissa Mayer really need to talk more.
—By TheStreet.com Contributor Rocco Pendola
CNBC Data Pages:
- Dow 30 Stocks—In Real Time
- Oil, Gold, Natural Gas Prices Now
- Where’s the US Dollar Today?
- Track Treasury Prices Here
At the time of publication, Rocco Pendola was long FB and P.