Blackrock's Jeff Rosenberg contends that stocks will beat bonds once again in 2015.» Read More
The same thing that happened to the housing market in 2000 to 2006 has happened to the oil market from 2009 to 2014, contends well-known trader Rob Raymond of RCH Energy. And he believes that just as we witnessed the popping of the housing bubble, we are in the midst of the popping of the energy bubble.
"It's the outcome of a zero interest rate policy from the Federal Reserve. What's happened from 2009 to 2014 is, the energy industry has outspent its cash flow by $350 billion to go drill all these wells, and create this supply 'miracle,' if you will, in the United States," Raymond said Thursday on CNBC's "Futures Now."
"The issue with this has become, what were houses in Florida and Arizona in 2000 to 2006 became oil wells in North Dakota and Texas in 2009 to 2014, and most of that was funded in the high-yield market and by private equity."
And now that a barrel of West Texas Intermediate crude oil has fallen from $100 to $60 in five months, those energy producers are in trouble.
The S&P 500 has fallen as much as 2 percent, from Friday's close to Tuesday morning's low. And while stocks bounced back later in the session, technician Louise Yamada believes that more selling is ahead.
"I think we're due for some kind of a pullback," Yamada, of Louise Yamada Technical Research Advisors, said Tuesday on CNBC's "Futures Now." "And the fact that the Dow is tickling 18,000 is always a hesitation, the S&P close to 2,100—you [would expect to] get some kind of a pullback."
Read MoreTough morning for global equities
Additionally, enthusiastic market sentiment could point to weakness as well, given that market sentiment is often viewed as a contrary indicator.
"The sentiment has been quite bullish, and would suggest a pullback the way we had in January, and the way we had in August, and the way we had in October."
Oil prices fell to a five-year low on Monday, after Morgan Stanley cut its 2015 forecast for Brent crude, citing oversupply.
The bank said Brent crude prices could average as little as $53 per barrel in 2015, although its base case scenario was for $70. This was down from an earlier estimate of $98.
"Without OPEC intervention, markets risk becoming unbalanced, with peak oversupply likely in the second quarter of 2015. Prices are set up to fall in the first half of 2015," said analysts Adam Longson and Elizabeth Volynsky in a report out late on Friday.
The price of oil has declined by around 40 percent since June, with Brent futures falling bellow $67 on Monday—their lowest level since October 2009.
The biggest trend of 2014 has been the incredible outperformance of the American economy when compared to the rest of the world. That divergence has reduced bond yields, sent the dollar surging, crushed commodities, and been a big tailwind for equities.
However, as stock prices have continued to surge, valuations have become more stretched and appear to have outpaced economic growth. That has left investors who watch traditional metrics unsure of how to invest in the year ahead.
"You can see the glass as half full or half empty," said Curtis Holden, senior investment officer with Houston-based Tanglewood Wealth Management. "It's half full because the U.S. right now looks pretty good as a place for investing verses the rest of the world. But it's half empty because this is a below-average recovery by our standards."
The latest piece of good news for America came on Friday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 321,000 jobs were created in November, in a rock-solid report that also showed mild gains in income.
This is in line with a string of relatively strong U.S. numbers, in comparison to a global situation that remains rocky at best.
Japan and Europe are both battling off deflation and recession. Separately, oil-producing nations like Russia have been hammered by the plunge in oil price—which is itself partially due to slowing global growth and surging U.S. energy production.
These trends have strengthened the U.S. dollar, bettered the position of the U.S. consumer, and caused bond yields to drop dramatically around the world and in America. This all conspires to make U.S. stocks more attractive, both in relative economic terms, and because they seem poised to provide greater long-term returns than bonds.
However, rising valuations have caused pause for some value-obsessed investors. While off recent highs due to a strengthening earnings outlook, the S&P 500's price-to-earnings ratio has risen dramatically over the past few years.
Noting the current elevated level of valuations on CNBC's "Futures Now," Marc Chandler of Brown Brothers Harriman gave a succinct piece of advice for those buying stock now: "Pray."
"That's the problem with being a value investor—sometimes the market does not provide value investments," he continued.
"The discipline means you wait until you find value, and that's what the great investors of our generation do," Chandler said. "They say 'There's no opportunity now, so I'm going to have to stay in cash.'"
Of course, not everyone is able to do that do that. Convergex chief market strategist Nicholas Colas says that U.S. outperformance has laid bare a stark difference between two different sorts of investors.
"The way the average investor is different from institutional investors is that average investors have a choice — 'Do I want to be in the market a lot, a little, or not at all?'
Institutional investors won't sit out the market, "and thus have to shift assets based on where the best opportunities are. And the clear winner is the U.S.," he said. "But for a lot of people, there's a big disconnect, because there's not a lot of wage growth, there's not a lot of good news," Colas said.
Colas reports that one of the common questions he hears is "'Nick, things aren't good, so why is the market doing well?'"
"If you don't want to play, I totally understand," he said. "But at the end of the day, if you're saving over the medium to long term, you won't get much return in bonds. You can hold cash, but to do that you have to save money. So if you want to maintain your standard of living, then you're left with stocks."
The "Minsky moment" is back.
Six years ago, the theories of economist Hyman Minsky were used to make sense of the collapse in housing prices, and its attendant effects on the economy. Today, Marc Chandler says the energy sector has just suffered its own Minsky moment. And while he doesn't expect it to take down the stock market, the slide in oil could have a serious impact on the high-yield bond market.
Minsky moment is a term coined by Pimco economist Paul McCulley in 1998, and it refers to a point when a period of rapid growth and risk-taking leads to a sudden turn lower and a crisis. Chandler, global head of markets strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman, says that is precisely what is happening in crude oil.
"Many people a couple years ago, a year ago, were saying that oil prices could only go up—'we're in peak oil'—meaning that we're running out of the stuff. So a lot of things were leveraged based on oil prices that can only go up. Sort of like house prices—'they can only go up.' So what happened is, because people held this as a deep conviction, they leveraged up," Chandler said Thursday on CNBC's "Futures Now."
In fact, the energy sector has borrowed $90 billion in the high-yield market since 2008, Chandler said, making energy producers "a large component of the high-yield market itself."
The problem is that "a lot of the loans, like loans on houses, were made not so much on a person's ability to repay the loan as on the value of the house. Similarly, the banks and investors bought high-yield bonds or leveraged loans on the energy sector not on the basis of their ability to repay it, but on the value of the oil in the ground."
Even after plunging almost 40 percent in five months, WTI crude oil prices will continue to fall in coming weeks, according to Oppenheimer senior energy analyst Fadel Gheit.
"Most likely this is not a bottom. Most likely we'll see oil prices going lower," Gheit said Tuesday on CNBC's "Futures Now." "The same traders and speculators that took oil prices from $95 to $70 will also be able to take oil prices from $70 to $60, or even $55."
Gheit said it's difficult to put a number on the bottom, because "once you get to a certain level you are going to see a lot of speculation. Speculation usually overheats oil prices on the way up, and really brings them down hard on the way down."
If you believe the so-called Doctor Copper theory, the diagnosis for stocks is not good.
Copper futures plunged to a 4½-year low Sunday evening, before staging a bit of a resurgence Monday. But with the industrial metal down 9 percent in the past three months, the "Doctor Copper" theory has become a warning, for some, about where stocks are going.
A time-honored concept in markets, the theory holds that copper is able to sense economic turning points early, and thus measure the health of a stock market rally. This is because copper is a near-omnipresent metal used in homes, in electronics and for many industrial purposes. The idea, then, is that if copper prices are falling, economic activity is slowing down, which is bad news for other financial assets.
"Because copper has so many industrial uses, it's probably a great indicator," said metals guru George Gero of RBC Capital Markets, so falling copper prices should indeed cause concern.
Still, Chris Kimble of Kimble Charting Solutions notes that copper has been falling for years, even as equities have skyrocketed.
"Over the past two or three years, if you followed copper, you would have missed the S&P rally," Kimble pointed out.
Kimble said that copper has thus far managed to hold an important support line that it tested in 2002 and 2009. If it breaks below monthly support, which currently lies at $2.75 per pound, he would become concerned about equities. By early afternoon Monday, March copper futures up 1.8 percent to $2.90.
Bond buyers are getting a lot less money for their time. The question now is whether that trend will continue in 2015—and what it will ultimately mean for investors.
Over the course of 2014, the spread between longer-term Treasury yields and shorter-term yields has gotten smooshed. The widely watched 10-year/two-year spread has plunged from 2.7 percent to nearly 1.7 percent, as long-term yields have fallen and short-term yields have risen.
This phenomenon, known as yield curve flattening (because the chart showing the comparison between maturities and yields usually shows a curve with the longer-term bond yielding more, but that curve flattens when the spread diminishes) is common during Fed rate hikes, but is traditionally taken as a signal of coming recession.
That's because if investors are not demanding a higher return for longer-term bonds, it shows that they don't think inflation or growth are set to pick up dramatically.
For Peter Boockvar, chief market analyst at The Lindsey Group, the flattening of the yield curve is problematic indeed.
"There's continued divergence between the optimism of the stock market, and what the yield curve is telling you about a continued slowing in the global economy, which is a threat to corporate profits," Boockvar said. "U.S. equity guys are much more bullish on U.S. growth and think we're decoupling; the bond market is not as optimistic."
Still, more benign explanations also suggest themselves.
The Federal Reserve has said it's looking to raise its federal funds rate target, with many expecting the first hike to come in June 2015. Since short-term yields tend to follow the lead of the benchmark fed funds rate, that should raise short-term Treasury rates.
Meanwhile, inflation readings have been benign, with the consumer price index showing inflation of 1.7 percent over the past year, which is below the Fed's stated 2 percent target. Inflation expectations are critical to longer-term yields, since investors need to be adequately compensated for the risk that the value of money will drop over the decades that they hold those bonds.
The man some regard as the new bond king believes that the flattening will accelerate on the back of a coming rate hike. In a recent interview aired on CNBC, Jeff Gundlach of DoubleLine Capital predicted that the big surprise of 2015 will be just how much the yield curve flattens out.
"I think the Fed's going to raise rates. The message of 2014 has been, as the potential for Fed rate hikes has increased, the long end has done nothing but rally. I think the yield curve is going to flatten at a level previously thought unthinkable," Gundlach said.
It hasn't been a great couple of years to be a gold bug. Since peaking at $1,923.70 per troy ounce in September 2011, gold has lost nearly 40 percent of its value. And while gold hasn't dropped dramatically this year, it has failed to gain back.
But according to George Gero of RBC Capital Markets, the bullion trade is set to turn around in 2015.
"The decline from the $1,900s down to the $1,150s is a major decline, and it was reflected by all the funds fleeing gold and running into better-performing assets, whether it's equities or debt, and that's been continuing," Gero said Tuesday on CNBC's "Futures Now."
In 2014, gold hasn't been helped by the dollar's rally. The greenback has shown serious strength against other currencies, which has reduced gold's attractiveness. After all, since gold is priced in dollars, an increase in the value of a dollar means a decrease in the value of an ounce of gold. Additionally, since people buy gold to hedge against potential inflation, ebbing inflation fears dull gold's appeal.
Gero acknowledges that "crude selling off, and OPEC possibly doing nothing about it, helping crude stay weak, is anti-inflationary—so the people that have been looking for inflation haven't really found it."
But he adds that "now you're going to see some changes based on all the stimulus in Europe, in China and in Japan."
Read MoreWhy is Putin buying gold?
Thursday's OPEC meeting is expected to have a profound effect on sliding oil prices. But according to one oil trader, it is not likely to be the effect that bulls are looking for.
OPEC nations "would certainly like [the oil price] to be higher, but in the short-term, I haven't heard anything that's going to cause it to go higher," Ray Carbone of Paramount Options said Tuesday on CNBC's "Futures Now."
Initial news out of Vienna, where the meeting is to be held, has not been encouraging. An early meeting between Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Russia and Mexico yielded no results. In fact, Igor Sechin of Russia's Rosneft said on Tuesday that due to operational reasons, Russia is unable to cut oil output in the near-term.
This news led to skepticism that OPEC would be able to agree to cut production substantially—and oil prices got punished intraday as a result. In fact, WTI crude oil closed Tuesday at the lowest level since September 2010.
"The one that matters the most is the Saudis, and is it in their interest to come in there with an almost unilateral big cut to surprise the market? I'm not sure it is at the moment," Carbone said.
Meanwhile, a smaller cut "could almost be worse than nothing. It would be viewed as a token cut which means they've used some bullets already."
CME Group brings buyers and sellers together through its CME Globex electronic trading platform and trading facilities in New York and Chicago.
Take your trading to the next level with a platform that lets you trade stocks, options, futures and forex all in one place with no platform or data with no trade minimums. Open an account with TD Ameritrade and get up to $600 cash.