The melt-up continued Friday with the S&P 500 closing at a 19-month high.
On the bullish side of the story, fresh data showed a 27-percent jump in new home sales in March. Also, new orders for durable manufactured goods (excluding transportation) posted the largest gain in over two years.
But on the bearish side of things, new worries surfaced about the prospects of Greece and other nations in Europe, after Athens appealed to its European partners and for emergency loans. The request set in motion the first financial rescue of a member of the euro zone.
All things considered- is this a market trading on flows or fundamentals?
Strategy Session with the Fast Money traders
This is a market that's trading on massive melt-up momentum, muses Gary Kaminksy. But, with over 640 new highs on the NYSE Friday I can't imagine a correction is coming. Too many fund manager are under-performing their benchmark index and that will likely drive the market even higher.
Out of 324 companies that have reported 234 have outperformed Street estimates, adds Anthony Scaramucci. That's a 72% beat; the best we've seen in 10 years. I think that provides a fundamental foundation.
I also think we're going higher, says Joe Terranova. The market shakes off catalysts that you'd think would take us lower. As a result if you're looking for a trade look at the sector that's underperformed - and that's energy .
I'm watching 1230 on the S&P, says Brian Kelly. That's a very important technical level. I think it acts like a magnet. I expect we melt-up to that level, but then investors use it as an excuse to sell.
APPLE HITS NEW HIGH
Let's look at what was working on Friday and that was Apple . The stock hit a new all time high and is now the 2nd biggest company in the S&P 500 by market value based on shares available to the public. Take a look:
Top 5 In S&P 500
Based on Shares Avail. To Public
What’s the trade?
The biggest names start to flatline when they achieve these kinds of milestones, says Anthony Scaramuuci. I'm not saying Apple will do the same, but history is not on its side.
Apple is different, counters Gary Kaminsky. Guys are chasing this stock. Portfolio manager just can't get long enough.
I'm bullish Apple with a stop below $250, says Joe Terranova.
TOPPING THE TAPE: CONSUMER SHARES
A surge in new home sales provided a tailwind for consumer shares with homebuilders and home improvement stocks among the big winners of the session.
What’s the trade?
I’m a believer in the housing recovery, says Brian Kelly. Strength in rail car loadings as well as an increased in the demand for lumber are positive signs. And I’d trade it with a downstream play. Look at Armstrongas a second derivative trade. They make floors.
In this space, I hold XLY puts, reveals Joe Terranova. But that's a mean reversion trade.
UNDER THE RADAR TRADE #1: AX-MEN
Steve Grasso recommends putting Louisiana Pacific, Owens Corning and Weyerhaeuser on your radar.
They benefit from the supply chain erosion, he explains. Many of their rival suppliers went out of business in the downturn.
UNDER THE RADAR TRADE #2: AD SPENDING
Gary Kaminksy suggests putting some of the media names on your radar.
Companies such as Hershey’s have upped their ad spend, and newspaper names should be the beneficiaries, Kaminksy says.
I'd play it with a long position in Media General or Belo , says Brian Kelly.
That's a beta trade, adds Steve Grasso. Don't buy and hold on this thesis. Pick your entry and exit points - it will be important to get out.
FINANCIAL REFORM RALLY
A big showdown between Washington and Wall Street takes place next week as senators from both sides of the aisle meet to discuss financial reform.
For insights on where the legislation stands right now, check out our interview with Christopher Whalen, editor of the Institutional Risk Analyst in the video above.
Our news partner, Reuters, provided this synopsis of the major reform proposals:
PREVENTING MORE BAILOUTS
* Objective: Squash the idea that some financial firms are "too big to fail." Prevent future bailouts like AIG's (AIG.N).
But also prevent disaster that can come from refusing to bail out troubled firms, as the Bush administration did in 2008 with Lehman Brothers. Its collapse froze markets worldwide.
Seeking a middle ground between bailout and bankruptcy, the Senate bill sets up an "orderly liquidation" process for large firms in distress. Authorities could seize and dismantle them.
The bill creates a $50 billion fund to pay for such actions. Firms with assets above $50 billion would pay into the fund.
Republicans object to this. The fund could borrow from the Treasury if it ran short of money. "Backdoor bailout," Republicans say.
* House-Senate dynamic: The House of Representatives bill, like the Senate's, sets up a new liquidation process but it is simpler and bigger.
The House wants a $200 billion fund. Firms with assets over $50 billion would pay $150 billion into it. The fund could borrow another $50 billion from the Treasury if needed.
* Winners and losers: If the new strategy works, the economy is better protected from damaging financial sector crises. Big financial firms are likely to take a hit by having to pay fees.
Some Republicans want to kill the liquidation fund idea entirely but "orderly liquidation" needs financing.
There is wide, bipartisan support for a new liquidation process. Someone will have to pay for it. With congressional elections set for November, it probably will not be taxpayers.
* Objective: Stop abusive home mortgages, credit cards.
The Senate bill creates a financial consumer protection bureau inside the Federal Reserve to regulate such products.
Obama and many Democrats want more, namely a watchdog that is an independent agency with more power than a Fed unit.
House-Senate dynamic: The House bill calls for an independent agency, while the Senate bill puts it in the Fed to appease Republicans.
The House bill exempts many businesses from the watchdog's oversight. The Senate bill has fewer outright exemptions.
Winners and losers: Consumers can expect stronger protections. Credit card firms and mortgage lenders face a tougher regulatory regime, regardless of where the watchdog is set up.
* Objective: Ban risky trading, unrelated to customers' needs, at banks with a cost-of-capital edge conferred by their being backed by taxpayers, either directly or otherwise.
Obama proposed this ban on "proprietary trading" in January along with his adviser, former Fed chairman Paul Volcker. It may become law but probably not as written.
Provisions embodying a "Volcker rule" are in the Senate bill but it leaves the door open to regulators watering it down later.
* House-Senate dynamic: A Volcker rule is not in the House bill.
* Winners and losers: Too soon to say. Volcker says enacting the rule would avert the next financial crisis. Large firms could lose profits if the rule is enacted. But the Senate bill, as written, falls well short of making that a certainty.
* Objective: Police the $450 trillion over-the-counter derivatives market. A hothouse for risk during boom years, it greatly amplified the financial crisis.
The Senate bill proposes new rules along lines sought by Obama. He wants to push as much OTC derivatives traffic as possible through exchanges, electronic platforms and clearing houses, boosting transparency, risk comprehension and price competition.
* House-Senate dynamic: The two bills are similar but the House exempts a wide range of end users from mandatory central clearing. The issue is complicated by involvement of the House and Senate agriculture committees, which have their own bills.
* Winners and losers. Wall Street mega-firms -- Goldman Sachs (GS.N), JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N), Citi (C.N), Bank of America (BAC.N) and Morgan Stanley (MS.N) -- dominate the market. The fat profits they reap from it would be reduced.
* Objective: Create a new entity to spot and head off the next crisis. The Senate bill sets up a nine-member council of regulators, chaired by the Treasury secretary.
* House-Senate dynamic: The House bill proposes a council chaired by the Treasury but gives the Fed a bigger role.
* Winners and losers: Big banks and financial firms would be forced into a tighter regulatory straitjacket.
* Objective: Rationalize the jigsaw-puzzle bank supervision system to stop problems from festering in the cracks.
The Senate bill lets the Fed keep oversight of large bank holding companies with assets over $50 billion. But the Fed would lose power over state banks with less than $50 billion in assets.
Those would shift to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, which would be in charge of all state banks and thrifts, as well as holding companies of state banks under $50 billion.
National banks with assets below $50 billion would be under the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which would also absorb the Office of Thrift Supervision, which would close.
* House-Senate dynamic: Big differences -- the House bill preserves the Fed's and FDIC's bank supervision roles.
* Winners and losers: OTS will close -- both the House and Senate bills call for that. Otherwise, banks would lose the ability to shop around for the weakest regulator.
EXECUTIVE PAY AND SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
* Objective: Give shareholders more say on executive pay and more clout in electing directors.
* House-Senate dynamic: Both bills back these ideas but the House is less forceful than the Senate bill on director nominations.
* Winners and losers: Corporate managers could lose their stranglehold on the director nomination process. Shareholders could gain more say on pay but it would largely be symbolic.
REGULATING HEDGE FUNDS
* Objective: Hedge funds must register with the government, opening their books to more scrutiny, but the Senate bill exempts venture capital funds and private equity funds.
* House-Senate dynamic: The House bill calls for registration of hedge funds worth $150 million or more. The Senate's cut-off level is $100 million. The House bill exempts venture capital funds from full registration, while requiring offshore funds to register. The Senate bill does not do this.
* Winners and losers: Regulators would gain a window into a murky market. An estimated 55 percent of hedge funds are already registered. Those that are not would have to do so.
* Objective: Make the securitization market more transparent and accountable. The Senate bill forces securitizers to keep baseline 5 percent of credit risk on securitized assets.
* House-Senate dynamic: The bills are similar.
* Winners and losers: Investors in securitized products would be better protected. Securitizers -- from lenders to Wall Street bundlers -- face stricter oversight.
CRACKING DOWN ON CREDIT RATING AGENCIES
* Objective: Boost the Securities and Exchange Commission's power over credit rating agencies. The Senate bill also reduces instances in the law that mandate use of unneeded ratings and exposes raters to more legal risk.
Got something to to say? Send us an e-mail at email@example.com and your comment might be posted on the Rapid Recap. If you'd prefer to make a comment but not have it published on our website send those e-mails to .
Trader disclosure: On April 23, 2010, the following stocks and commodities mentioned or intended to be mentioned on CNBC’s Fast Money were owned by the Fast Money traders; Grasso Owns (DYN), (LPX), (ASTM), (ABK), (BAC), (BGP), (C), (CVGI), (JPM), (NEM), (PRST), (PFE), (BA), (T), (CSCO), (X); Scaramucci Owns (AAPL), Skybridge Owns (AAPL); Scaramucci Owns (AMZN), Skybridge Owns (AMZN); Scaramucci Owns (BAC), Skybridge Owns (BAC); Scaramucci Owns (C), Skybridge Owns (C); Scaramucci Owns (GE), Skybridge Owns (GE); Scaramucci Owns (GOOG); Scaramucci Owns (GS), Skybridge Owns (GS); Scaramucci Owns (JPM), Skybridge Owns (JPM); Scaramucci Owns (WFC), Skybridge Owns (WFC); Scaramucci Owns (XOM), Skybridge Owns (XOM); Scaramucci Owns (SI), Skybridge Owns (SI); Terranova Owns (HES), (AXP), (TER), (SWN), (XCO); Terranova Owns (C) May Calls; Terranova Is Short (CMA); Terranova Is Short (LCC); Terranova Is Long (XLY) May Puts; Kelly Owns (FXE) Puts; Nations Owns (MSFT); Nations Owns (SPY)
GE Is The Parent Company Of CNBC
For Joe Terranova
Terranova Works For (VRTS)
Terranova Is Chief Market Strategist Of Virtus Investment Partners, Ltd.
Virtus Investment Partners Owns More Than 1% Of (XLU)
Virtus Investment Partners Owns More Than 1% Of (IGE)
Virtus Investment Partners Owns More Than 1% Of (XLY)
Virtus Investment Partners Owns More Than 1% Of (DBV)
Virtus Investment Partners Owns More Than 1% Of (XLP)
Virtus Investment Partners Owns More Than 1% Of (XLB)
Virtus Investment Partners Owns More Than 1% Of (XLV)
Virtus Investment Partners Owns More Than 1% Of (XLI)
For Steve Grasso
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (CUBA)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (GERN)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (HSPO)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (MERC)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (NWS.A)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (NXST)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (NYX)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (PDE)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (PFE)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (PRST)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (RDC)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (TLM)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (XRX)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (SDS)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (MERC)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Own (TBT)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Are Short (QQQQ)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Are Short (CL)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Are Short (AAPL)
Stuart Frankel And Its Partners Are Short (CVGI)
For Brian Kelly
Kanundrum Capital Owns (CCI)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (NYT)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (MORN)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (BX)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (MEG)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (SEE)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (TLT)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (DHI)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (AWI)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (ATW)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (NOV)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (UPL)
Kanundrum Capital Is Long U.S. Dollar
Kanundrum Capital Is Short (MCO)
Kanundrum Capital Is Short (DB)
Kanundrum Capital Is Short (STT)
Kanundrum Capital Is Short Euro
Kanundrum Capital Is Short Yen
Kanundrum Capital Is Short Swiss Franc
Kanundrum Capital Owns (DHI)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (AWI)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (ATW)
Kanundrum Capital Owns (HEW)
For Eugene Profit
Profit's Firm's Funds Own (MSFT)
Profit's Firm's Funds Own (GOOG)
Profit's Firm's Funds Own (XOM)
Profit's Firm's Funds Own (AAPL)
Profit Owns His Firm's Funds
CNBC.com with wires