20 Under 20: Transforming Tomorrow

Excellence Requires No Degree: Thiel Foundation Member

Michael Gibson|Associate at Thiel Capital and Vice President of Grants for the Thiel Foundation

Editor’s note: As part of CNBC’s “20 Under 20: Transforming Tomorrow” TV documentary, Michael Gibson of The Thiel Foundationexplains why he thinks college is not the only key to success.

The grand illusion today is that college is the only path to a happy, successful, intellectually stimulating, fulfilling life. Many people who believe the illusion is real take this doubt as a comforting platitude meant for the high school graduates and dropouts who’ve never thought of applying to college. And that may be true.

Tooga | Getty Images

But Shakespeare didn’t read Shakespeare to become Shakespeare. When we say college isn’t necessary for success, we also mean that’s true for the brilliant, vital few who want to build something of lasting value now, rather than waiting, going through the motions for four years while accumulating debt.

Last year we started the 20 Under 20 Thiel Fellowship because we wanted to help young entrepreneurs and visionaries get started on their ideas as soon as possible. During the two-year program, each fellow receives $100,000 and mentorship from our network of innovators, engineers, scientists, thought leaders, and business development experts.

Our first class has started companies, secured a book deal, raised million-dollar funding rounds, won international awards and sparked a do-it-yourself educational movement. Inspired by their success, on June 13, we announced our second class of Thiel Fellows.

By no means are we telling all college students that they should drop out. But we do encourage all of those students on the threshold to think hard about their choices. If going to college requires taking on tens of thousands of dollars in debt, we advise you to learn a set of skills to pay it off. And above all, don’t go into debt if you can avoid it.

And yet, even with this warning, the bubble in higher education is still inflating and still frightening. The cost of college has gone up 439 percent since 1982, and the quality of learning has stagnated.

This is the opposite of what you would expect in a competitive market. You would expect quality to increase as prices fell.

Instead of yearly improvements — like we see with smart phones and tablets — we find this set of deplorable facts about higher learning:

  • In 2012, 54 percent of recent college graduates are underemployed or unemployed, even in scientific and technical fields.
  • There are 115,000 janitors, 83,000 bartenders, 323,000 restaurant servers and 80,000 heavy-duty truck drivers with bachelor's degrees. Needless to belabor, these jobs do not require the BA.
  • More than forty percent of students fail to graduate from four-year colleges within six years.
  • Median wages for those with a bachelor’s degree are down over the last ten years.
  • Total student loan debt has surpassed $1 trillion. This is more than total credit-card debt in America.
  • Unlike mortgage holders, students cannot declare bankruptcy to discharge their debts. Outside of repayment, only death and disability will eliminate the debt.
  • The average college student spends fewer than thirty hours per week on their studies.
  • Thirty six percent of students do not show a significant improvement in learning over four years in college.
  • Universities face no consequences for teaching useless subjects or for pretending to teach useful ones to students who come out of school with zero skills.

How did it come to this?

There aren’t many industries where the market leaders are the same after two hundred and fifty years. Besides colleges, three other industries come to mind: religions, governments, and graveyards.

There are roughly two models of how higher education works, the human capital model and the signaling model. The human capital story is the one every parent believes in. It says students accumulate skills in college that they then use in their careers to obtain higher lifetime earnings.

To show how improbable this story is, think about everything you’ve forgotten of what you learned in college. If college teaches you skills, and you’ve forgotten them, how exactly is that helping you earn a higher salary? Or, if you have a job, ask yourself: does you college major bear any relation to your work?

The signaling model is a little more complicated. It says that the labor market is like the used car market and it’s difficult to separate the lemons from the industrious and intelligent. In order for people of quality to send an accurate signal of their talents to potential employers, they have to do things that the lemons can’t do. One way to do that is to send a costly signal that is difficult to mimic, such as spending four years demonstrating remarkable diligence on useless tasks and obediently jumping through hoops.

Think of the difference between West Point cadets and super models. Presumably West Point takes a skinny 18-year-old recruit and turns him into a courageous soldier. Whereas modeling agencies don’t actually make people more attractive. They just chose really attractive people and put them on runways.

We believe Harvard is more like a modeling agency than like West Point. At $60,000 a year for four years, buyers beware.

—Michael Gibson is an associate at Thiel Capital and is vice president of grants for the Thiel Foundation, where he helps run the 20 Under 20 Thiel Fellowship

Tune in:

Watch "20 Under 20" on CNBC. Part I Premieres August 13 and Part II Premieres August 14 at 10p ET

For more details on “20 Under 20: Transforming Tomorrow,” check out our Facebook app and follow our Tumblr blog.