Whistleblower Says Dreamliner Batteries Could ‘Explode’

Securaplane Whistleblower on 787 Batteries

Michael Leon is adamant about his fear about the use of lithium-ion batteries on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

"These lithium-ion batteries are heat intolerant. Too much heat on those things, they will go into a thermal runaway, they will explode, it will be a nightmare," he said.

Leon is a former employee of Securaplane Technologies in Tucson, Arizona. He was fired in 2007 for repeated misconduct. He says it was in retaliation for voicing concerns about the batteries but when he took Securaplane to court, he lost. A federal administrative court judge ruled in favor of Securaplane.

Today, Securaplane manufactures the charging system for lithium-ion batteries used on 787 Dreamliners. Its plant in Tucson is one of the locations visited by investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board as they try to determine what went wrong with two Dreamliners earlier this month.

"There is a lot more work to be done before we can determine a cause," said Debbie Hersman, Chairman of the NTSB.

(Read More: Still No Timetable for Returning Boeing 787 to Flight)

This Battery 'Just Decided to Explode'

Michael Leon was a senior engineering technician at Securaplane in 2006 conducting tests for the charging units that work with the lithium-ion batteries in the Dreamliner. Leon said what happened one day is a scene he will never forget.

"My BCU wasn't running and this lithium-ion battery just decided to explode," said Leon. "The magnitude of energy that came out of this battery, I cannot quantify it. I ran out of there and armed myself with 30 pounds of Halon and I ran back into the inferno. By then all the walls were on fire."

The fire at Securaplane in 2006 was well documented at the time. Boeing said it was the result of a test set up improperly, and it was not a case where a lithium-ion battery simply exploded for no reason.

Securaplane said its charging unit has been successfully tested in the Dreamliner. It disputes Leon's allegations.

"There was a fire in the facility in 2006 during one test of a prototype of the battery-charging unit. However, the current Boeing 787 investigation is unrelated to the 2006 fire," said Fiona Greig, spokeswoman for Securaplane. "There is no connection between the Dreamliner battery issue and the dismissal of Michael Leon from Meggitt's US-based subsidiary, Securaplane."

The damaged battery case from a fire aboard a Japan Airlines (JAL) Boeing 787 Dreamliner airplane at Logan International Airport in Boston is displayed inside an investigation lab at National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Headquarters in Washington, DC.
Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

Ever since the FAA grounded Boeing's Dreamliner, there have been renewed questions about the safety of using lithium-ion batteries to provide power on the 787. The primary concern is the potential flammability of the batteries.

(Read More: Japan to Investigate Boeing 787 Battery Maker)

Leon fears the worst for the Dreamliner if questions surrounding the 787's lithium-ion batteries are not resolved. "What concerns me is if this happens on the aircraft and they are flying over the ocean or something, everybody is going to die," he said.

Still Searching for a Cause

Meanwhile, in Washington, D.C., Hersman said the NTSB is still trying to determine the exact cause for two Dreamliner batteries catching on fire. One incident happened after a Japan Airlines 787 landed in Boston Jan. 7. The other happened during an All Nippon Airways flight in Japan on Jan. 16. In both cases, nobody was hurt.

"We know that the lithium-ion battery experienced a thermal runaway, we know that there were short circuits and we know there was a fire," Hersman said. What the NTSB does not know at this point is what exactly prompted the battery malfunctions.

(Read More: 787 Design Flaw Could Be Serious Trouble for Boeing: Aviation Expert)

In briefing reporters, Hersman declined to say if she would feel comfortable clearing the Dreamliner to fly again. That decision will ultimately be made by the Federal Aviation Administration. While Hersman was careful not to call the Dreamliner unsafe, she made it clear the significance of battery problems on two Dreamliners cannot be overstated.

"This is an unprecedented event. We are very concerned," she said. "We do not expect to see fire events onboard aircraft. This is a very serious air safety concern and the FAA has taken very serious action."

People Will Flock to This Plane

One week after the FAA grounded the fleet of 50 Dreamliners currently in service, the eight airlines flying those planes remain supportive of Boeing and the eventual return of the 787. That includes United Airlines, the only U.S. carrier to fly the plane.

(Read More: Airlines Stick With Boeing 787, Despite Problems)

After reporting fourth-quarter earnings Wednesday morning, United Airlines CEO Jeff Smisek held a conference call with reporters. When asked if he's worried about customers avoiding flights on the Dreamliner when the grounding is ultimately lifted, Smisek said no.

"The aircraft is a terrific aircraft and customers love the airplane," Smisek said. "I have no doubt that customers will flock back to that airplane as soon as we get it back up again."

Investors also believe Boeing will eventually get past the Dreamliner grounding. One week after the FAA banned flights of the 787, shares of Boeing have gone up — a sign Wall Street and investors believe the Dreamliner will not ground Boeing's profitability.

(Read More: Hold Boeing Stock Despite 787 Turbulence: Analysts)

—By CNBC's Phil LeBeau; Follow him on Twitter @LeBeauCarNews