Trump said he will raise tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese goods to 30% and hike duties on another $300 billion in products to 15%.Politicsread more
Stocks dropped after Donald Trump ordered that U.S. manufacturers find alternatives to their operations in China.US Marketsread more
Federal Reserve Vice Chair Richard Clarida said Friday that the global economy has deteriorated in the past month.Marketsread more
The latest escalation in the trade war ups the odds the economy will fall into recession and that the Fed will aggressively cut rates.Market Insiderread more
Here are the products that stand to be the most affected by China's new tariffs on $75 billion worth of U.S. goods.Marketsread more
"We don't need China and, frankly, would be far better off without them," Trump tweeted.Politicsread more
"My only question is, who is our bigger enemy, Jay Powell or Chairman Xi?" Trump wrote amid a series of tweets that rattled markets Friday.Politicsread more
"I would love this to be clarified. We come to a deal on trade, boy, this market is up 10 to 15%, but without it's going to be worrisome," Jeremy Siegel says.Marketsread more
The final week of August could be highly volatile as markets fret over the economy and the latest developments in trade wars.Market Insiderread more
Tesla solar panels ignited at an Amazon warehouse in Redlands, California in June 2018, Bloomberg reports. The news comes days after Walmart sued Tesla for at least 7 fires...Technologyread more
The death comes as federal and state health officials investigate a slew of lung illnesses in connection to e-cigarette use.Health and Scienceread more
Ben S. Bernanke and the markets are having a hard time understanding each other.
Despite a near uniform consensus on Wall Street that the Federal Reserve would start to withdraw its economic stimulus this month, the central bank surprised strategists by announcing Wednesday afternoon that it would indefinitely maintain its bond-buying program at full strength.
Stocks jumped after the 2 p.m. statement from the Fed, and the 10-year Treasury yield, an important benchmark for consumer borrowing rates, fell.
While the continuation of the stimulus program helps stock investors, the Fed's apparent change of heart sowed confusion that is likely to last far beyond Wednesday in markets around the world. Many on Wall Street were left wondering how they got it so wrong, with several pointing an accusing finger at Mr. Bernanke, the Fed chairman, and the central bank's communication strategy.
For his part, Mr. Bernanke appeared to put some of the blame on Wall Street.
"The Fed and the market have not been on the same page, and that's very apparent in what happened at 2:01 p.m.," said Michael Hanson, senior United States economist at Bank of America, and one of the few strategists to have predicted that the Fed would stand pat on its bond buying.
Since May, when Mr. Bernanke first signaled that the Fed could start to wind down its efforts to stimulate borrowing and the economic growth, Wall Street has been preoccupied with predicting when and by what degree that would happen. At its June meeting, Fed policy makers said that the economy was nearly strong enough to begin doing without the full force of the stimulus program.
As a result, investors around the world spent much of the summer adjusting to the idea that the Fed would begin a retreat from its monthly buying of $85 billion in Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities.
Figuring out what would come next involved navigating in uncharted territory: The breadth and scale of the steps taken by the central bank to get the economy back on its feet in the wake of the financial crisis have been without precedent. The bond-buying programs have helped push up stock prices and kept interest rates low, making it easier for borrowers to take out home and auto loans.
The expectation that those programs would soon start to ease has caused interest rates to rise, which has hurt many emerging market economies that had come to rely on lower rates.
The recent preparations paved the way for the mixture of confusion and euphoria that broke out on Wednesday afternoon.
"In one line: Delay is good policy, the communications strategy is in pieces," Ian Shepherdson, chief economist of Pantheon Macroeconomics, wrote in a note on Wednesday.
(Read more: No taper! Did Bernanke fool the Street?)
The Standard & Poor's 500-stock index jumped 20.76 points, or 1.2 percent, to close at 1,725.52. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 147.21 points, or nearly 1 percent, to 15,676.94. Both indexes reached record nominal closing highs.
The Nasdaq composite index gained 37.94 points, or 1 percent, to 3,783.64, its highest close since late September 2000, when the dot-com boom was fading.
Movements in the bond markets were much more extreme. The price of the Treasury's 10-year note jumped 1 11/32, to 98 11/32, while its yield dropped to 2.69 percent, from 2.85 percent late Tuesday.
Investors also bought mortgage bonds, paving the way for a reversal in the recent rise in mortgage rates. This helped bolster the shares of home builders like KB Home, which soared 8.2 percent, and DR Horton, up 6.9 percent.
Gold prices rose more than 4 percent.
On Wednesday, Mr. Bernanke still suggested that a pullback could begin later this year, but he said that Fed officials had determined that the economy was not on strong enough footing to begin adjusting its stimulus programs this month.
In his news conference after the Fed's statement, Mr. Bernanke appeared to acknowledge that the central bank had gone against the expectations of the market. Mr. Bernanke said that part of the problem was the sheer complexity of the stimulus programs, which made it hard to predict future policy.
"We are dealing with tools that are less familiar and harder to communicate about," he said.
But Mr. Bernanke suggested that some investors were not paying sufficient attention, pointing to his past promises not to change policy until economic data, and particularly unemployment numbers, showed significant improvement.
"Asset purchases are not on a preset course," he said with audible frustration. "They've always been conditional on the data."
On Wall Street, there were many competing theories about why the Fed had defied expectations.
Michael Gapen, the chief United States economist at Barclays, said on Wednesday that he believed the Fed had purposely misled investors to push up interest rates and knock out speculation in risky financial products.
Mr. Bernanke gave some fuel to this argument when he said on Wednesday that he had been gratified to see the sell-off over the summer in more speculative products like junk bonds. But he also said that he was unhappy with the broader rise in interest rates, which had pushed up prices for mortgages and other consumer loans.
Most economists said on Wednesday that the disconnect between the Fed and Wall Street was more likely a result of unintentional flaws in the Fed's analysis and communications.
Paul Ashworth, the chief United States economist at Capital Economics, said that recent speeches by Fed officials had displayed a significant amount of disagreement at the central bank about how to move forward.
"They don't even appear to be able to agree on it themselves, internally, " he said.
But Mr. Ashworth said that even if there was division within the Fed, Mr. Bernanke and the other officials could have been more clear about what economic indicators they were looking at to make their decisions.
"The onus should always be on the Fed to explain what it is doing," he said.
Eric Green, the global head of research at TD Securities, said that for the Fed "it's tough for them not to lose credibility on this."
"You set the whole world up for something and then you backed away," he said.
Mr. Hanson, one of the few strategists to have predicted the Fed's decision, said that at least some of the fault lay in Wall Street's inability to hear the nuance in Mr. Bernanke's past statements, and to leave open the possibility that Fed officials could change their mind.
"The Fed told us what they were looking for, and we were not seeing it," Mr. Hanson said. "The market didn't appreciate just how data dependent the Fed would be."
—By Nathaniel Popper of The New York Times