The trade war between the United States and China has lasted for more than one year — and a resolution is nowhere in sight.World Economyread more
The Fed is expected to cut rates Wednesday, but it is unlikely to tell markets what they want to hear on future rate cuts.Market Insiderread more
Pelosi said Trump should not have tried to address China's trade practices in a way that opened Americans up to financial pain.Politicsread more
Investors await the Fed's latest decision on monetary policy, set to be released on Wednesday stateside. The U.S. central bank is widely expected to cut rates by 25 basis...Asia Marketsread more
TransferWise posted an annual net profit of £10.3 million on revenues of £179 million.Technologyread more
Live the high life with a night's stay at Highclere Castle, the iconic stately home made famous by Downton Abbey.Spendread more
Large banking institutions face the risk of failure if interest rates in Europe continue to stay negative, warns the global chief economist of the Economist Intelligence Unit.Banksread more
The fallout from two fatal crashes of Boeing 737 Max planes has ensnared the manufacturer's most-loyal customer: Southwest Airlines. The carrier has canceled thousands of...Airlinesread more
Brent crude oil jumped the most in history in the previous session after attacks on Saudi's oil industry disrupted the kingdom's production.Marketsread more
In the survey, conducted after the third in the Democratic Party's series of debate, the former vice president draws 31% compared to 25% for the Massachusetts senator. At 14%,...2020 Electionsread more
Stocks rose slightly on Tuesday, but gains were capped as the Federal Reserve kicked off a two-day monetary policy meeting.US Marketsread more
What the Federal Reserve giveth, the Federal Reserve could also taketh away.
While the wealthy don't show any signs of worrying about the effects of tighter money, they should be, according to economist Marc Faber.
Faber, who publishes The Gloom, Boom & Doom Report, told CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Monday that the wealthy could lose up to half their wealth due to tighter monetary policy and an ensuing collapse in asset prices. He didn't offer a time frame for this to occur.
But he said easy money from central banks—especially quantitative easing—has created global asset bubbles. High-end real estate and other favored assets of the wealthy will be hardest hit.
(Read more: Druckenmiller: Fed robbing poor to pay rich)
"We are in a gigantic asset bubble around the world with prices of real estate having risen a lot," he said. "The high end is at record highs. In the Hamptons, in Mayfair, London, Hong Kong, Singapore, and we have a high inflation overseas, so I think that one day this asset inflation will lead to deflationary collapse one way or the other."
Faber echoes a growing number of financiers—from billionaire hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller to Omega Advisors' Leon Cooperman—who argue that the Fed policy has made the wealthy wealthier, primarily through rising asset prices. Rising stock markets have fueled a record number of millionaires in the U.S., with 1.7 million new millionaires added in the past 12 months, according to Credit Suisse.
(Read more: Why government probably can't close rich-poor gap)
And so far, the wealthy show little concern about the impact of a change in Fed policy. A recent survey from BMO Private Bank found that 61 percent of millionaires say they are better off today than they were before the recession. Only 7 percent say they are worse off. Fully 86 percent have returned to their peak spending levels.
But Faber suggested that, as the main beneficiaries of Fed policy, the rich would also be the hardest hit when the policy changes.
(Read more: Fed could up QE to $1 trillion a month: Marc Faber)
"If you think that high end will never lose anything …," he said. "This is all the result of quantitative easing. The Fed wanted to get the stock markets going. That's what QE-1, 2, and 3 are all about. Move people out the risk curve, and so far it's worked."
Granted, Fed policy isn't the only reason the wealthy are wealthier. The rich were getting richer long before quantitative easing.
(Read more: Want to invest in diamonds? Good luck with prices)
And the wealthy have sought to protect themselves from any Fed-driven downturn with large piles of cash and big investments in hard-assets that are less volatile than stocks.
But those hard assets—real-estate, land, art, cars, diamonds and commodities—could fall as hard or harder than stocks when the Fed starts to slow the money spigot. While the wealthy don't seem to be worried now, they ought to be.
—By CNBC's Robert Frank. Follow him on Twitter @robtfrank.