A quarter of the S&P 500 companies report earnings next week, and that could buffet the market as investors await the July Fed meeting.Market Insiderread more
Iran's Revolutionary Guard claims a British tanker it still holds, Stena Impero, failed to follow international maritime rules.World Newsread more
Amazon hires Trump-allied lobbyist Jeff Miller as battle for Pentagon contract heats up.Politicsread more
In a series of tweets, the president addressed an unusual controversy stemming from a speech delivered Thursday by New York Fed President John Williams.Marketsread more
"You need to understand that we're about to embark on the busiest week of the year for industrial earnings," CNBC's Jim Cramer says.Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
Boston Federal Reserve President Eric Rosengren is lining up against an apparent push to cut interest rates, telling CNBC in an interview Friday that the central bank can...The Fedread more
The MTA reported that the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 trains are all facing delays due to a network communications issue impacting service in both directions, NBC New York reports.Transportationread more
Companies aren't waiting for the U.S.-China trade war to be resolved, says the head of the world's biggest money manager.Investingread more
US officials including Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow will host a meeting at the White House on Monday of semiconductor and...Technologyread more
Trump's constant berating of the Fed and its actions does not influence the central bank's decisions, Boston Fed's Eric Rosengren says.The Fedread more
The lawsuits allege J&J's talc-based baby powder contained asbestos and caused ovarian and other cancers.Health and Scienceread more
Google is embroiled in a legal fight with UK internet users who are suing the internet giant for allegedly breaching their privacy.
Google asked the High Court on Monday to rule that the forthcoming case be heard in the US, where it is based, rather than in England.
The case brought by three British users is significant because it touches on growing public concern about online privacy and use of personal data.
(Read more: )
The claimants, who include Judith Vidal-Hall, a self-employed editor, and two directors of IT firms, are suing Google over what they claim was the clandestine tracking and collation of information on their internet usage on the Apple Safari browser between summer 2011 and spring 2012, which they say was carried out without their knowledge.
In written arguments submitted to the pre-trial hearing, the users claim the information obtained by Google "was aggregated and sold to advertisers who used its DoubleClick advertising service."
Google was able to obtain information in areas such as which websites they had visited, and was able to track surfing habits, and collect information on areas such as users' interests, hobbies, shopping habits, social class and political and religious beliefs, as well as information about their health and financial situation, the written submissions claim.
(Read more: )
Google's actions "are likely to have affected millions of users in the UK and around the world in respect of which it must have made a substantial proportion of its advertising revenue profit," the written arguments allege.
About 170 people have contacted Olswang, the law firm bringing the claim over misuse of private information and breach of confidence, although the current action is being brought on behalf of a small group of test claimants.
The claimants allege they "had a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of the information tracked and collated by the defendant", which was "unjustifiably infringed" by Google during the period in question.
(Read more: Google mulled ditching US after NSA scandal)
They also claim Google owed a "duty of confidence" to them which it breached when it tracked their information.
Google has already agreed to pay a $22.5m civil penalty in August 2012,to settle charges brought by the US Federal Trade Commission that it misrepresented to users of Safari that it would not place tracking cookies or serve targeted advertisements.
Antony White QC, acting for Google, told the High Court on Monday thatthere was no suggestion "the defendant will continue or repeat the conduct complained of".
Google has already given undertakings to a number of US states governingits future conduct with users, the High Court was told.
(Read more: Protesters formhuman blockade around Google bus)
Mr White told the court: "All Safari browser users worldwide have the benefit of these steps."
Google, in its written arguments, claims the UK courts have no jurisdiction to try the claims brought against it and "none of the claimants suffered any economic loss or physical damage" and so any damages would be "very modest".
Olswang's Dan Tench said before the hearing: "British users have a right to privacy protected by English and European laws.
(Read more: Google execs got huge jet fuel discounts, NASA says)
"Google may weave complex legal arguments about why the case should not be heard here, but it has a legal and moral duty to users on this side of the Atlantic not to abuse their wishes. Google must be held to account here, even though it would prefer to ignore England."
The two-day legal hearing on whether the case should be heard in England must be determined before any future trial is listed. The case continues.
Follow us on Twitter: