Wall Street is becoming convinced that both the White House and Beijing are willing to engage in a protracted trade war that could begin to hit consumers and slow global...Market Insiderread more
Stocks fell sharply on Thursday as U.S.-China trade worries persisted with more companies suspending business with Chinese telecom giant Huawei.Marketsread more
A Ministry of Commerce spokesperson does not single out any U.S. action, but it's been a tense couple of weeks for the trade war.World Politicsread more
The e-mail's optimistic tone helped Tesla shares turn positive for the first time in seven days.Technologyread more
In a four-page letter sent Thursday morning, Warren and Ocasio-Cortez asked Mnuchin a series of questions about his advisory role in former Sears CEO Eddie Lampert's...Politicsread more
Amazon is reportedly getting into the wearables space. It would help the company learn more about customers, and potentially corner the market on a demographic of older,...Technologyread more
The Trump administration announced a $16 billion aid program for American farmers that includes a three-pronged package of aid for American farmers who have been hurt by the...Politicsread more
"This time, another temper tantrum, again. I pray for the president of the United States," Pelosi said. "I wish that his family or his administration or his staff would have...Politicsread more
"For them to say that they don't work with the Chinese government is false," Secretary of State Mike Pompeo tells CNBC.Politicsread more
The yield on the 10-year Treasury note fell to its lowest level since 2017 as more traders grew confident in a longer U.S.-China conflict.Bondsread more
Prosecutors allege Stephen Calk, former president of Chicago-based Federal Savings Bank, loaned former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort as much as $16 million in exchange...Politicsread more
Heading into the 2012 election, Las Vegas casino magnate Sheldon Adelson made the headlines scream when he announced his intentions to spend $100 million on Republican candidates. It seemed like an unfathomable amount of money for an individual, even an incredibly rich individual, to fork over in a single election cycle.
Now, two years later, it's clear his nine-figure barrelhead was just setting the bar.
Earlier this year, that San Francisco hedge fund manager Tom Steyer talked up his own plans to spend $100 million in 2014 to support of environmentally friendly politicians, particularly those who oppose the Keystone pipeline. Then last week, Poltico reported that the Koch brothers' main political outfit, Americans for Prosperity, intends to spend $125 million on an all-out campaign to support conservative candidates.
"As mind-boggling as that seems, a billion-dollar donor is only a matter of time," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director for the Center for Responsive Politics, a watchdog group that tracks political contributions. "The trajectory is only going in one direction, whether you are talking about the total costs of elections, which is on an inexorable climb—two steps forward, one step back. "
As Steyer and Adelson have demonstrated, megadonors are no longer cagily demurring about how much money they intend to spend. Quite the opposite: They are haughtily advertising it.
"I think it is a badge of honor," said Fred Davis, a Republican media consultant who has worked with major donors on outside-group campaigns.
"There is a star quality of having a big round number," said Krumholz.
And now that liberals donors have more fully joined the Super PAC fray—after some initial angst over 2010 Supreme Court ruling that paved the way for unlimited contributions to outside groups—a true game of one-upmanship is afoot.
The intensifying megadonor arms race has been egged on of late by the battle for the Senate, which is very much up for grabs.
"I think to a large degree the reason you are seeing so much money is because the balance of power is real," said Rick Tyler, a former top aide to Newt Gingrich. During the 2012 election, Tyler served as an advisor for Winning Our Future, a pro-Gingrich Super PAC that received $20 million from Adelson.
That was roughly the same amount liberal billionaire George Soros dropped jaws with in 2003, in an unsuccessful attempt to boot George W. Bush from the White House. His failure had a cooling effect on his giving: In 2012, for example, he waited until the last leg of the presidential election before finally handing over $1.5 million to Democratic Super PACs, a relative pittance compared to the other side.
There was some hope among campaign reform types that Republican electoral failures in 2012 would halt the spending bonanza by Adelson, the Koch brothers, and their like-minded plutocrats.
But that has proven wishful thinking.
"If you look at Sheldon's entire career, the guy started out selling newspapers. He clearly never gives up," said Tyler. "That is how he created his whole empire—by persistence and not giving up."
Adelson has indicated he will try to spend his money on more electable candidates, as opposed to spending less of it.
Bill Allison, editorial director of the Sunlight Foundation, said the current stable of megadonors are largely ideological and therefore more keen to doubling (or tripling) down—even in response to past nonsuccesses.
Allison said he "wouldn't be shocked" if an individual donors drops $200 million in the 2016 election. And as we've come to see recently, even wild projections tend to fall short of reality.
Davis said the arms race is not just being accelerated by donors trying to prove something, but by an industry of political functionaries drawing increasingly ambitious budget proposals.
"Do these (donors) generally say, 'My number is $125 million?'" said Davis. "No, there is somebody selling them on that investment, whether it is Karl Rove or some of the liberal groups—there is somebody out there getting their eye and catching their attention."
—By Daniel Libit, special to CNBC.com.