The suburbs are over, and young people are flooding into big cities. That has been the growing consensus of builders, Realtors, urban planners and even environmentalists during this housing recovery. However, it just may not be true.
Millennials are not flocking to big cities, at least according to newly released Census figures analyzed by Trulia's chief economist, Jed Kolko.
"From 2012 to 2013, population growth for millennials (20-34 year-olds) was highest outside big cities," wrote Kolko in his report. "Millennial population growth in 2012-2013 in big, dense cities was outpaced by big-city suburbs and lower-density cities and even by lower-density suburbs and smaller cities."
While an outsized number of younger people have moved back in with their often suburban parents, that is not the primary driver of this growth. It is more because the suburbanization and ex-urbanization that was all the rage during the McMansion-fueled housing boom has slowed. Sure, the nation's urban areas are growing faster than in 2006, but still not ahead of the denser suburbs.
So who is fueling growth in big cities? Babies, aged 0 to 4. The stroller set skews strongly urban, according to the Census data. Even though the overall number of young children declined, likely due to a still weak economy, it grew fastest in the most urban counties.
Having a baby has always been the greatest driver of homeownership, but with higher home prices in 2013 and higher mortgage rates, many young parents, potentially first-time homebuyers, have been unable to buy a suburban home.