The dramatic drop in oil prices touches every U.S. industry: Energy production and refining, logistics and transportation, construction, retail and more. What's viewed as a negative for some energy-focused companies is, in turn, a positive for consumers filling up their tank.
That dynamic presents a double-edged sword for the banking industry, which will not only see higher costs but also huge benefits from the drop.
As the price of oil falls, energy production becomes less profitable and cash flow decreases, which analysts say will lead these companies to focus on cutting costs in response. If companies can't adjust fast enough, though, they could miss interest payments on loans or bonds—or could see their day-to-day operations constrained by the focus on servicing that debt.
Energy junk bonds now yield nearly 8 percentage points more than comparable Treasurys—compared to just 4 percentage points back in June before prices began tumbling. That's a signal that investors are repricing the risk of owning that debt.
Analysts have singled out a few banks that could be most exposed to this type of slowdown.
JPMorgan analyst Vivek Juneja writes that Wells Fargo appears the most exposed, since it has the highest portion of its business coming from the energy patch. In 2014, Wells Fargo syndicated $26.4 billion in leveraged oil and gas loans—the most of its peers and 27 percent of its total leveraged loans—and also underwrote $4.3 billion in high-yield bonds for oil and gas companies (26 percent of its high-yield business), and also higher than other banks.
To boot, Juneja said, Wells Fargo also gets the highest share of its investment banking fees from the sector compared to its rival banks—and much of that activity will stall due to market volatility and valuation.
Large-cap banks might be safeguarded by the fact that many of their oil and gas clients are also large cap and stable in nature. A note from Matthew Burnell at Wells Fargo (which does not cover itself), said that smaller, regional banks could see more exposure as prices remain volatile but that energy-focused regulation has kept their portfolios from growing too risky.