The attacks come after state and local ransomware attacks in New York, Louisiana, Maryland and Florida resulted in the loss of significant sums.Technologyread more
Twitter and Facebook have suspended accounts believed to be tied to a state-backed disinformation campaign originating from inside China.Technologyread more
Beijing will lower borrowing costs for companies, but that may not boost the economy as much as some hope.China Economyread more
United States Steel Corp will temporarily lay off hundreds of workers at its Great Lakes facility in Michigan in coming weeks, according to a filing the steelmaker made with...US Marketsread more
The report comes as Trump in recent days has lashed out over media reports about growing recession fears.Politicsread more
Stocks are bouncing higher but could be trapped in a range longer term, until there's a resolution of the trade wars.Market Insiderread more
Stocks in Asia edged higher Tuesday morning as investors await the release of minutes from the Reserve Bank of Australia's July meeting. The People's Bank of China is also set...Asia Marketsread more
Powell will have the opportunity if not to walk back the "midcycle" assessment then to at least provide some further explanation about what it means.Economyread more
Apple has spent more than $6 billion on original TV shows and movies for its forthcoming Apple TV+ service, according to a Financial Times report on Monday.Technologyread more
The Business Roundtable, led by Jamie Dimon, gives a new definition of the "purpose of a corporation."Marketsread more
"These days, the consumer is addicted to convenience ... If it doesn't have a great digital presence or incredible bargains, take a pass," Jim Cramer says.Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
U.S. presidents can't control all the twists and turns of the global economy, but their policies do affect the growth of household incomes over time.
Some presidents have fared far better than others when it comes to household income growth, according to a new analysis by economist Rob Shapiro for the Brookings Institution. Over the last four decades, which presidencies have come out on top in terms of U.S. wage growth and which have lagged?
"Reagan and Clinton have the best records and the two Bushes have the worst, " Shapiro said.
President Barack Obama falls somewhere in the middle.
(Courtesy of the Brookings Institution.)
Shapiro studied how household incomes grew from the Reagan administration through the first term of Obama using new data on household income by age from the U.S. Census Bureau. He found that household incomes experienced a sharp drop in growth between the 1980s and 1990s and the start of the 21st century.
During the Reagan and Clinton presidencies, households of virtually every type experienced large, steady income gains. It made little difference if the households were led by men or women, by blacks, whites or Hispanics, or by people with high school diplomas or college degrees. "Income inequality was increasing in the 1980s and 1990s, but it didn't matter because everyone's incomes were growing fast," Shapiro said.
The 21st century was not so kind. Most household incomes stagnated or declined through nine years of economic expansion and two years of recession between 2002 and 2013. Only two types of households achieved gains in that period—ones headed by college graduates and those led by people in their 20s. But their gains were much smaller than those experienced by young and college-educated households in the 1980s and 1990s.
The boom in information technology, which meant businesses required a more educated workforce, as well as increased competition from a globalized economy, contributed to flagging household incomes in the 2000s, Shapiro said.
Beyond partisan scorekeeping, the analysis highlights that your peak earnings years may come sooner than you think.
Shapiro found that households headed by people in their mid-20s to mid-30s experienced the largest percentage gains in median income. After that, wage increases generally slow and finally stop when the heads of households reached their 50s.
The results echo the dismal findings of a recent study from researchers at the New York Federal Reserve. They found if workers start off earning less, they don't ever catch up. In fact, the wage gap widens and pay increases begin to plateau in their 40s.