The Goldman Sachs technology M&A team, led by Sam Britton, has cashed in on its software focus and decades of experience to dominate 2019's biggest deals.Technologyread more
American small and medium-size companies that rely on China are scrambling to adjust their business plans in response to the escalating trade war.Traderead more
Here are the products that stand to be the most affected by China's new tariffs on $75 billion worth of U.S. goods.Marketsread more
The summit comes amid fears over a global economic slowdown, and U.S. tensions over trade allies, Iran and Russia.Politicsread more
The world's second biggest economy is past a point where it cannot ignore its enormous debt anymore, according to an analyst.China Economyread more
Carl Medlock used to work at Tesla. Now he's one of the few people in the U.S. that can fix the company's original Roadster electric vehicles.Technologyread more
Trump does have some powerful tools that would not require approval from U.S. Congress.Politicsread more
Stocks dropped after Donald Trump ordered that U.S. manufacturers find alternatives to their operations in China.US Marketsread more
As demand for lab monkeys continues to rise, U.S. scientists are reporting delays in research projects because they can't obtain enough animals, according to the National...Politicsread more
The European Union will respond in kind if the U.S. imposes tariffs on France over digital tax plan, EU chief Donald Tusk told G-7.Technologyread more
Trump said he will raise tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese goods to 30% and hike duties on another $300 billion in products to 15%.Politicsread more
When it comes to out-of-pocket medical bills, many Americans don't have enough money in their pockets—or anywhere else—to cover what they might end up owing.
A new study finds that significant numbers of people have less money available in liquid assets than what they face in the maximum deductibles and total out-of-pocket health cost limits under insurance plans.
Only three in five households have enough liquid assets to meet a deductible of either $1,200 per individual or $2,400 per family, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation study. Only about half of U.S. households had enough such assets to cover higher deductibles of $2,500 per individual or $5,500 per family.
The situation only gets worse for households when considering their exposure to total out-of-pocket costs. Just 48 percent of households have enough liquid assets to cover what were considered to be the mid-range of such out-of-pocket health cost limits: $3,000 per individual and $6,000 per family, according to the Kaiser study.
Just 37 percent can meet the higher range of such costs, or $6,000 per individual and $12,000 per family, the study found.
People whose household incomes are moderate or lower-than-moderate have a tougher time scraping together enough cash to cover such costs, according to Kaiser.
But even among people who earn more than four times the federal poverty level, as many as 38 percent of of them lack enough available cash to pay the maximum amounts they would personally owe for health-care bills during a year.
The findings come as job-based health plans—the most common form of private insurance in the U.S.—are shifting more of the costs of medical care to enrollees. Those costs include deductibles, co-payments and co-insurance.
"A fair number of households don't have that kind of money in the bank to cover a higher deductible, or to pay their entire...potential out-of-pocket exposure," said Gary Claxton, lead author of the Kaiser report.
"That doesn't mean they can't borrow money or put it on their credit cards," he said. "But they don't have the cash to make the payment."
The study comes with a caveat: It looked at the highest amounts that people could face in deductibles and total out-of-pocket costs, not at what the average person actually pays during the year. Healthy people can end up paying little or no out-of-pocket medical costs in a given year.
"It's the person who gets really sick who faces the potentially big bills," Claxton said.
For the purposes of the study, Kaiser considered a "liquid asset" to be either cash, or financial instruments such as stocks, bonds or money market funds that could be easily converted into cash. The study then looked at the assets held by households that had at least one person without health insurance, and at assets held by households where everyone had health coverage.
While fully insured households were better positioned overall to cover deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs, having insurance is no guarantee that people will avoid having to borrow to satisfy those bills, Claxton said.
Among fully insured households that earned between 100 to 250 percent of the federal poverty level—or $11,670 to $29,175 for individuals—just 29 percent had liquid assets greater than the mid-range of maximum out-of-pocket costs: $3,000 for an individual, and $6,000 for a family.
That, however, fell to a mere 18 percent of households when their assets were compared to the high range of out-of-pocket costs: $6,000 per individual, and $12,000 per family.
Only 47 percent of fully insured families earning between 250-to-400 percent of the poverty level would be able to cover the mid-range of out-of-pocket costs with liquid assets, Kaiser found. And Just 33 percent of such families could cover the higher range.
Among fully insured households that earn more than 400 percent of poverty level, 78 percent had liquid assets in excess of the the mid-range of out-of-pocket costs. Still, when the high range of such costs were considered, just 65 percent of the richer households would be able to foot the maximum with their liquid assets.
"That explains why we get fairly large percentages of people saying they have a hard time paying their medical bills, even when they have insurance," Claxton said.
The numbers were more dire when the study looked at households that include at least one person who did not have health insurance.
Just 11 percent of such households earning between 100 and 250 percent of poverty level range had liquid assets that were greater than the mid-range of out-of-pocket limits. For those households earning between 250 and 400 percent of the poverty level, 24 percent had sufficient assets for mid-range out-of-pocket costs.
And only half of such households earning more than that had enough liquid assets available to cover the mid-range of out-of-pocket costs.