The massive market transformation this month that some on Wall Street called a "once in a decade opportunity" might have just been a one-off technical move because of taxes.Marketsread more
The Pentagon will deploy U.S. forces to the Middle East on the heels of the attack on Saudi Arabian oil facilities, United States Secretary of Defense Mark Esper announced...Defenseread more
CNBC did a deep dive through the most recent Wall Street research to find stocks that analysts say are underappreciated.Marketsread more
Shares of MasterCard are up 46% this year, and 1120% since 2011, getting a boost from the strong U.S. consumer.Investingread more
CNBC sat in on an "empathy training" at Amazon PillPack's Somerville offices, which is part of new hire orientation.Technologyread more
Trade with China is the 'big unknown' for the Federal Reserve as it decides how best to support the U.S. economy, says Council on Foreign Relations Director of International...Futures Nowread more
Lobbying experts said the visit is likely an attempt to be in lawmakers' ears as they consider legislation that would impact Facebook.Technologyread more
Yardeni Research's Edward Yardeni believes the U.S. economy is picking up steam.Trading Nationread more
Iran's audacious drone and cruise missile attack on Saudi Arabia's oil producing facilities has provided a critical test yet for the Trump administration's foreign policy. A...Politicsread more
Chinese trade negotiators suddenly canceled a visit to meet U.S. farmers after they wrapped up trade talks in Washington this week.Marketsread more
As if job interviews weren't already hard enough on the nerves, a new study by the Journal of Business Research has confirmed what many sweaty-palmed interviewees may have feared: What you wear that day could play a role in determining whether you get the job. Tweet this
Not only that, it could also be a contributing factor in how much you earn.
The study's authors showed 150 students at a Korean university one of three videos depicting a woman interviewing for an internship with a movie agency. All three versions of the video were identical, with the exception of the logo shown on the woman's white polo shirt.
According to the findings, when an applicant wore a luxury label to the interview, respondents considered her to be a more suitable candidate for the job. She was also more likely to earn a higher wage. Whereas 15.6 percent of respondents said the candidate wearing a Louis Vuitton logo should earn more than 13,000 won, or about $11.88 an hour, only 2.4 percent said the same for the candidate wearing the H&M brand.
Zero respondents said the woman wearing no logo should be paid more than 13,000 won.
"The higher perceived status of the wearer of a luxury brand (versus the wearer of no brand clothes that are otherwise identical) produces benefits in social interactions including preferential treatment and, sometimes, financial benefits," the study said.
Pearse McCabe, an executive with Dragon Rouge global brand strategy company, agreed that brands play a big role in expressing who a person is, and who they can aspire to be.
But that doesn't necessarily mean that job seekers should shell out thousands of dollars for the latest high-end fashions.
McCabe cautioned that people can't hide their true selves behind luxury labels, because people offer so many other signals when they communicate.
"Brands are just one factor in the way that we make decisions about people," he said.