Fewer people in this age bracket also have landline phones or DVRs and, at 47 percent, they have the lowest adoption rate of bundled services of any age group except for those over the age of 75.
The industry contends that the increasing cost of TV programming and infrastructure investments force them to raise rates, but others point to the industry's high profits and the near-monopoly that the biggest companies have in many parts of the country as evidence that the American consumer is getting the short end of the stick.
For example, they note that, even with a $36 million decline from a year ago, Time Warner Cable still earned a profit of $463 million in its last quarter, and cable communications at Comcast (NBCUniversal's parent company) had a 6.3 percent jump in revenue last quarter to $11.7 billion.
That's a cause for concern for providers. William F. Osbourn, Jr., Time Warner's senior vice president, controller, chief accounting officer and acting co-CFO, told investors on the company's most recent quarterly conference call that triple-play customers contribute half of the company's residential recurring monthly revenue, and that they tend to jump ship, or "churn," less often.
In response to competition from streaming offerings, cable companies have been rolling out "skinny bundles" of fewer TV channels for a lower price, but Rayburn, the media analyst, said these have limited appeal because they tend to exclude popular, but expensive, programming like sports.
They also have been increasing prices on current customers, a strategy that many analysts say may backfire.
Read More Bundle? You can't stop technology: Ex-ESPN head
Vincent Moy, entertainment industry analyst at the NPD Group, said prices for monthly cable service have been increasing this year even as subscriber bases have declined.
"The quickest way for cable companies to grow their revenue is charge more to the customers they already have," he said. "Ultimately, this may prove counterproductive … (if) they decide to cut the cord altogether."
Time Warner and Comcast did not respond to NBC News' request for comment.
But even cord-cutters are still tethered to operators for broadband Internet access, another area where consumers may not be getting their money's worth.
"What we're finding is that consumers in the U.S. pay more for less … than their peers around the world," said Sarah J. Morris, senior policy counsel at think tank New America's Open Technology Institute.
In a 2014 study, the institute found that home broadband connectivity at every speed was more expensive on average in the U.S. than in Europe. It also found that major American cities lag in both speed and pricing compared to overseas counterparts like Seoul, Hong Kong, Paris and even Bucharest, Romania.
Read More Cramer: The TV bundle pits the young against old
"A lot of this breaks down to competition … even though the ISPs like to claim the market for broadband Internet access is competitive, when you really break it down, it's not," Morris said. "This exacerbates low speed for high cost."
The lack of competition was underscored by a Federal Communications Commission report that found nearly two-thirds of Americans can only get the fastest category of broadband connectivity from a single provider, and one in five can't get download speeds of 50 megabits per second, or Mbps, at all. Even at the lowest tier of high-speed broadband categorized by the FCC — 4Mbps of download speed — roughly a quarter of households have one or no providers.
And that's for a speed the agency itself describes as inadequate. "Four megabits per second isn't adequate when a single HD video delivered to home or classroom requires 5Mbps of capacity," FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said in a presentation last fall. For some perspective, downloading a movie at 4 megabits per second would take more than half an hour.
Read MoreComcast sells its own cord-cutting service — which requires Comcast's cord
Giving Americans access to a greater number of providers, especially municipal or new entrants like Google's Fiber project, requires incumbent providers to invest in their own infrastructure and be more competitive on price, Morris said.
"One of the policies recommendations we've made over the years is to really encourage more locally owned and operated networks," she said, adding that many efforts to create them are fought by established players fight with legislation and litigation.
The result is a raw deal for consumers, Morris said. "In all of these rankings we've done, we tend to see the U.S., especially offerings from the traditional providers, middling at best."
So what's a besieged consumer to do? TODAY's Jean Chatzky recently looked at some ways to cut the TV portion of your bill. Click here to read her suggestions.