These are the stocks posting the largest moves before the bell.Market Insiderread more
CNBC's Mike Santoli breaks down the aggressive buying of "sure things" and shunning of cyclical and policy risk.Trading Nationread more
The Iranian Intelligence Ministry held a briefing on Monday where they announced the alleged spies were Iranian citizens but trained by the CIA.World Newsread more
Equifax will pay at least $575 million, and potentially as much as $700 million, to settle allegations over its massive over 2017 data breach, U.S. regulators said in a...Technologyread more
In its latest attempt to build market credibility, China on Monday launched the Science and Technology Innovation Board, or "STAR Market," on which 25 companies were listed.China Economyread more
Two traders say Boeing's on the path to recovery.Trading Nationread more
Bridgewater Associates's flagship fund reportedly posted one of its worst first-half performances in two decades.Hedge Fundsread more
The U.S. will likely emerge the winner in a "cold currency war" that is heating up, an expert said.Currenciesread more
These box office numbers do not include the cost of production or marketing costs. They also don't count the billions in merchandising that Disney has made over the last...Entertainmentread more
Shares of Micron rose on Monday following an upgrade to buy from neutral from Goldman Sachs, citing a faster-than-expected deceleration in memory chip production.Investingread more
Tariffs are the only instrument left for addressing China's systematic and excessive surpluses on its U.S. trades, writes Michael Ivanovitch.US Economyread more
Frank Kendall is in an awkward position. He is the guy at the Pentagon with the checkbook, the under secretary for acquisition, technology and logistics. That gives him a lot of power with the defense industry, as he represents its No. 1 customer — the U.S. taxpayer.
At the same time, he has less money to spend than he used to, and even less than he expected to have. "We're sitting here under the threat of this crazy sequestration thing, which is frankly crippling to the department," he said.
It's made even worse because Congress has yet to come up with a full-year budget, meaning the Defense Department will have to operate under last year's budget, forcing Kendall to cut $20 billion in spending he'd been planning on.
For defense companies, that means less money coming in and less stability for predicting what the Pentagon will do. As a result, the biggest industry players have been busy adding billions of dollars to their share buyback programs to help shore up stock prices. Lockheed Martin is about to close on its acquisition of helicopter maker Sikorsky, which could portend a wave of consolidation among big players.
Kendall is not a fan of either move.
"For-profit companies are financially motivated," he said, adding that defense companies are a little different, since most of their profits come from taxpayers. Lockheed Martin is using some of those profits to add another $3 billion to its share repurchase program. Northrop Grumman announced that it plans to buy back an extra $4 billion worth of shares.
"They're free to do that," Kendall said. "I would personally prefer to see them making capital investments, doing research and development, to get ready for the next round of defense budget increases, which is inevitably going to occur at some point."
In response, Northrop Grumman spokesman Randy Belote said the company's priorities with capital are "to be investing in our business, managing the balance sheet, maintaining a competitive dividend and returning excess cash to our shareholders though share repurchases. We believe these priorities are serving our shareholders and the company as well."
Analyst Howard Rubel at Jefferies thinks Kendall is misguided. "Pentagon officials ought to take a lesson in economics to understand how the capital markets work," he said, "rather than come up with these statements that are really devoid of understanding economics."
Kendall feels it is his responsibility to weigh in. "I'm very concerned about U.S. technology superiority, and I look at the modernization programs in China in particular, and Russia. I think we have cause to be concerned," he said. "One thing that can give us a head start is the independent investments industry makes to prepare for the next round of defense budget increases."
The under secretary has ruffled feathers with a program that would require defense companies to run any R&D projects by the Pentagon first if they expect to be reimbursed down the road.
"The initial idea I had was to have sponsorship; that was seen as being like approval," he said. Now he's trying "something with a lighter touch, which is basically like, the government has to be briefed."
The reaction from the defense contractors? "Industry is mostly relieved I didn't do something worse for them," Kendall said.
Then there's the issue of consolidation. "It's not necessarily best for the government to have that happen," Kendall said. After Lockheed Martin got Department of Justice approval to acquire Sikorsky from United Technologies, Kendall became concerned that soon the Pentagon will only have two or three very large contractors to buy from, giving him less buying power. But there's little he can do to stop the acquisition, and that is something he'd like the change.
Kendall thinks having competition in military contracts could be considered national security, and that's a tool he'd like to have the next time two companies plan to merge.
"I'm working with my staff, and I'm working with Congress, and I'll be making some recommendations to Congress about what they might do along those lines," he said.