Stocks should rally if the U.S. and China agree to new negotiations and a ceasefire in the trade war, but the economic impact of tariffs will continue.Market Insiderread more
More than 300 companies are talking to government officials in Washington about how detrimental the trade war is.Marketsread more
Powell stresses the central bank's independence in a speech that comes amid continuous pressure from the White House to cut interest rates.The Fedread more
In a text message, Grisham confirmed to CNBC that she will still be working for the first lady even as she takes on her new roles.Politicsread more
Acting Customs and Border Protection Commissioner John Sanders is resigning amid the furor over the Trump administration's treatment of migrant children.Politicsread more
NBC is taking the office back from Netflix as it seeks to bolster its own streaming service launching in 2020.Technologyread more
Wayfair employees plan to walk out tomorrow, after no action was taken in response to their opposition to the company supplying border detention camps with beds for children.Retailread more
Micron beat analyst estimates on earnings and revenue for its fiscal third quarter of 2019.Technologyread more
Omarosa Manigault Newman, who had been a senior advisor to President Donald Trump before her firing, was sued for allegedly failing to file required financial disclosures.Politicsread more
San Francisco on Tuesday became the first city in the country to ban e-cigarettes after city officials voted in favor of an ordinance that prohibits the sale of any...Health and Scienceread more
See which stocks are posting big moves after the bell on June 25.Market Insiderread more
It was a short, well-flagged mission and no shots were fired. But Beijing has been pitched into uncharted waters over how to respond to Tuesday's operation in which a US warship challenged its claims in the South China Sea.
While state media lit up with emotional appeals to nationalism on Wednesday, the official response has so far been muted.
"China's defence ministry is strongly opposed to this act and lodges solemn representations," was all the military could muster on Tuesday, while the foreign ministry summoned the US ambassador to lodge a complaint.
But support seems to be building for a firmer response and one option, alluded to obliquely by one senior official on Tuesday, is to militarise the islands — something Beijing has this far insisted is not its objective.
"We do not hope that in the end China has no choice but to find that it is indeed necessary for us to accelerate and strengthen our capabilities there," said Lu Kang, a foreign ministry spokesman.
Aerial pictures taken by the US already show airfields and fortifications: on Fiery Cross Reef a 3,000m runway has been constructed that is capable of handling fighter jets. A second such airfield appears to be under construction on another island.
Wu Shicun, president of the Hainan-based National Institute for South China Sea Studies, is among those who believe Beijing may choose the militarisation route, stationing fighter planes and warships on the islands.
"If America only comes into the South China Sea this one time, then China might only take one-time action. If America decides to frequently enter this region, this will make China feel threatened . . . they will have a reason to militarise the islands in order to ensure their safety."
More from the Financial Times:
Richard Bitzinger of the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore concurs. "I don't think the Chinese need much excuse to militarise the islands," he says. "The escalation so far has been chiefly on their side. They will wait to see how often the US does this and for how long, and whether other countries, such as Japan, get involved."
Others see less bellicose outcomes. Gary Li of Beijing-based consultancy Apco Worldwide sees China finding a "face-saving and de-escalatory path" out of the confrontation — if the US makes no further incursions.
"The islands are always going to be militarised to an extent. But the difference is whether there are 10 guys living in houses with stilts, or several hundred guys in reinforced bunkers with fighter planes," he said.
Much will hinge on the next US move and whether or not it targets other countries, which would demonstrate impartiality.
Paul Haenle, director of the Carnegie Tsinghua Centre in Beijing, says: "The fact that [the US] hadn't operated near the features in question since 2012, and are now doing so after a period of heightened tension in US-China relations over this issue, likely contributes to China's perception that the primary US goal here is to target them."