Officials remained firmly committed to a "patient" policy stance at their meeting earlier this month.The Fedread more
Stocks that would benefit from a federal infrastructure spending program fell after President Trump ended a meeting on infrastructure spending with Democratic leaders.Market Insiderread more
The president abruptly walked out of a meeting Wednesday, saying he would not negotiate with Democrats while they continue to investigate him.Politicsread more
Despite the president's claim that "you can't investigate and legislate simultaneously," certain must-pass pieces of legislation, including a debt ceiling hike, will...Politicsread more
Americans in certain areas of the country have significantly higher average credit scores than others. Experian's annual State of Credit report shows the average score in each...Spendread more
Amazon shareholders demanded the company to take action on a number of different issues during its annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday.Technologyread more
Talk about 5G is everywhere right now, from the trade-war with China to the ban on Huawei. Here's what 5G is and why it matters.Technologyread more
Controversial lawyer Michael Avenatti was indicted on charges of trying to extort athletic shoe giant Nike out of tens of millions of dollars by threatening to go public with...Politicsread more
More voters in five key industrial states disapprove than approve of Trump's handling of trade — 56% to 41%, according to a report.Politicsread more
Ireland's privacy watchdog, which leads supervision of Google in the EU, launched an inquiry into the firm's online advertising practices.Technologyread more
These are the stocks posting the largest moves midday.Market Insiderread more
Two tech CEOs have come out in support of Apple CEO Tim Cook's against a court order to unlock a San Bernardino attacker's iPhone.
In an open letter Wednesday, Cook wrote, "the government's demands are chilling. … We are challenging the FBI's demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country."
A California federal judge ordered Apple on Tuesday to assist in the San Bernardino investigation by designing a new operating system to disable the feature that erases all contents after 10 failed passcode attempts. This would allow the FBI to use as many permutations of passwords to unlock the iPhone 5C used by Syed Rizwan Farook.
While public opinion may be divided on whether Apple should unlock the terrorist's iPhone, Google boss Sundar Pichai as well as Jan Koum, CEO of messaging service Whatsapp, are among those who have backed Apple's decision.
Pichai, among the highest paid CEOs of America, defended Cook in a series of tweets, including one saying, "Could be a troubling precedent."
Koum, a Facebook board member, wrote on the social media site, "I have always admired Tim Cook for his stance on privacy and Apple's efforts to protect user data. … We must not allow this dangerous precedent to be set. Today our freedom and our liberty is at stake."
And Edward Snowden, who first criticized Pichai for not immediately speaking out, proceeded to retweet the Google CEO.
Many tech experts also supported Apple's decision, with one telling CNBC that Cook's decision to stand by customers' privacy is correct.
"His priority is to provide privacy to [Apple] customers," said Tim Bajarin, president of Creative Strategies, an advisory firm that provides market research services for the technology industry.
"If [Cook] gave the FBI the 'back door' encryption code, it would set a precedent," Bajarin told CNBC.
"It is true that [the government] is positioning this as an isolated case, but because of the way our justice system works, it becomes a precedent, and once a precedent is set, [the government] or other cases can come back and use this to try and get the same action in the future" he said.
Bajarin adds that if Apple sets the precedent for U.S. government to access the iPhone contents via "brute force," Russia and China could follow suit and try to use similar rulings to access information.
In a country that has a longstanding tradition of granting its citizens civil liberties, the "American public opinion is split," said Edward Reilly, global chief executive officer of strategic communications at FTI Consulting.
"When people think there is a legitimate issue of national security, [then the] government can have enhanced authority, but they're very uncomfortable with that," said Reilly.
With the passage of the Patriot Act post-Sept. 11, how the law enforcement and intelligence community used their extended authorities to access private information has been hotly debated.
The issue of privacy versus national security is not a new topic, but Cook's refusal to comply with the court order is.
"I think this is an important enough issue that the Supreme Court should decide," said John Mauldin, chairman of Mauldin Economics.
Modern society also has "to decide how much privacy we want, how we want to legislate it, and how we want to control it," Mauldin said in a CNBC interview.
Correction: An earlier version misspelled Edward Reilly's last name.
Follow CNBC International on and Facebook.