Investors are rushing into the relative safe haven of the bond market, causing the yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury to plummet.Real Estateread more
President Donald Trump on Thursday directed the U.S. intelligence community to "quickly and fully cooperate" with Attorney General William Barr's investigation into the...Politicsread more
The U.S. Commerce Department said its proposed rule would amend the normal countervailing duty process to include new criteria for currency undervaluation.World Economyread more
Markets in Australia and Japan looked set to open slightly lower as investors worried over trade tensions between the U.S. and China.Asia Marketsread more
Wall Street is becoming convinced that both the White House and Beijing are willing to engage in a protracted trade war that could begin to hit consumers and slow global...Market Insiderread more
Stocks fell sharply on Thursday as investors started to fear the U.S.-China trade war is slowing the economy.Marketsread more
"The last thing I want is to put a date out there for lifting the grounding," said Dan Elwell, acting administrator for the FAA.Transportationread more
The charges allege he published secret documents obtained by former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, some of which included the disclosure of foreigners who were...Politicsread more
TransferWise, the money transfer start-up, was valued at $3.5 billion after investors bought $292 million of shares in a secondary sale.Technologyread more
See which stocks are posting big moves after the bell on Thursday, May 23.Market Insiderread more
Sentiment is "not negative enough to trigger a huge rally ... unless we get some kind of real breakthrough with China," Jim Cramer says.Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
The 2016 presidential election is giving new meaning to the political maxim "It's the economy, stupid."
That's because most economists believe that when it comes to formulating growth plans and talking intelligently about the challenges ahead, the candidates primarily have been, well, stupid.
Collectively, the field of Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump received a thrashing from a field of economists surveyed by Bankrate.com. Fully half of the 24 experts gave the candidates an "F," with most of the others assigning the group a "D."
Respondents groaned both that the candidates' plans were half-baked, and that there is a general lack of attention to serious economic debate during the campaign.
A typical comment: "F. There has been no debate about economic issues during the current presidential campaign," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics.
There was little charity elsewhere.
Bill Dunkelberg, chief economist at the National Federation of Independent Business, was among the kindest, giving the candidates a "C." Seth Harris, scholar at Cornell University, said the Democrats deserved an "A" while the GOP side (presumably Trump as he is the sole remaining candidate) scored a "D."
"There was kind of a universal observation that the political candidates are not being pressed on economic issues sufficiently," said Mark Hamrick, senior economic analyst at Bankrate.
"When we try to measure financial literacy or economic literacy, the U.S. isn't at the top of the list," he added. "People are looking for a Twitter-version solution of things instead of thinking about well thought-out plans. There still may be plenty of time for these solutions to be presented, but it doesn't feel that any of these solutions are as thoughtful and elegant as we'd like to see."
The economists surveyed also gave President Barack Obama a "C+" grade for his handling of the economy. They see the unemployment rate dropping to 4.7 percent a year from now, with 63 percent believing the chance of a recession is less than 1 in 4 over the same period. More than 80 percent expect GDP growth of less than 2.5 percent, while the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield is projected to rise to 2.49 percent in a year from its current 1.8 percent.