Saturday's attack is the biggest on Saudi oil infrastructure since Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait in 1990.Energyread more
Saudi Aramco is aiming to restore by Monday about a third of its crude output that was disrupted after drone attacks on two key oil facilities, The Wall Street Journal...Marketsread more
"Blaming Iran won't end disaster. Accepting our April '15 proposal to end war & begin talks may," Zarif said on Twitter.Energyread more
Oil prices are expected to jump as much as $10 per barrel after a coordinated drone strike hit Saudi Arabia's largest oil field, forcing the kingdom to cut its oil output in...Marketsread more
Apple's new iPhones can still send texts, download apps, and make video calls, but the company spends a lot of time and effort marketing its new phones as powerful photography...Technologyread more
The trucking industry is worth hundreds of billions of dollars per year. Uber is going after this market with Uber Freight, an online platform that matches truckers with...Technologyread more
Some U.S. manufacturers say tariffs, if targeted, will help address longstanding unfair trade practices like intellectual property theft.Traderead more
Supporters of a $15 minimum wage ballot initiative in Florida argue the state's inflation-tied pay hikes have not gone far enough.2020 Electionsread more
Saudi Arabia shut down half its oil production Saturday after drone strikes hit the world's largest oil processing facility in an attack claimed by Yemen's Houthi rebels.Politicsread more
Trusii's hydrogen water machines were supposed to help users with their health problems, but customers claim the company is involved in a giant scam.Technologyread more
The decoupling of the world's two weightiest economies seems as inescapable as its extent and global impact remains incalculable.Politicsread more
The president of the United States should not interfere in the government review process of mergers and acquisitions, former Federal Communications Commission Chairman Reed Hundt told CNBC on Tuesday.
"This is still another case of Donald Trump having a unique view about how our system works," Hundt said in a "Squawk Box" interview.
If Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton were elected, he argued that she would favor "following the precedents that were set in the previous reviews, and one of them was the approval of Comcast and NBC, but with a lot of tough conditions."
While the Comcast-NBC deal was struck before the introduction of federal net neutrality measures, Hundt said the extensive conditions were in the spirit of promoting the free flow of content on the internet.
Whether the AT&T-Time Warner deal passes depends on the willingness of the companies to accept the expected conditions imposed by the Justice Department and the FCC, he said.
The proposed merger would bring together a wireless, broadband and satellite TV giant with a content powerhouse in movies and television.
For example, "suppose AT&T wanted to use what's called 'zero-rating,' meaning you buy the AT&T wireless phone and you can have all of the data that includes HBO that you want: something distinctive about an AT&T wireless service," Hundt said.
But, according to Hundt, the solution is not so easy. The former FCC chairman said that among federal regulators, zero-rating is still "an unresolved question," leaving ample room for disagreement in dealings.
Luckily for AT&T, Hundt said the fee for breaking off the deal is relatively small. "If AT&T doesn't like the [government's} conditions, they can walk away without paying an arm and a leg."
AT&T would pay Time Warner $500 million if the deal doesn't go through under certain conditions. But if Time Warner were to back out of the deal, the media giant has agreed to pay AT&T a $1.7 billion termination fee.
Christine Varney, whose law firm represented Time Warner in its negotiations with AT&T, told CNBC on Tuesday that the federal government is as concerned about innovation as it is about maintaining a competitive market, which she believes will help the deal pass.
A partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore and the former head of the antitrust division at the DOJ, Varney said that regulators will understand that the deal is between two complementary companies, and that it will serve to benefit consumers rather than lessen the playing field and raise prices.
"The law and the facts here really dictate that you look at market power of the company before the transaction and the market power after the transaction. Before the transaction, AT&T is not producing world-class content, and before the transaction, Time Warner is not selling mobile service. So, post-transaction, what you have are two complements coming together," she said on "Squawk on the Street."
Varney, who was a former commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission, said she is "100 percent confident" in the ability of federal regulators to analyze the deal based on the law and the facts, which she said uphold the companies combining.
Political noise plays an essentially inconsequential role in the government's serious factual review, Varney said.
"There was a case in the 1970s where somebody in the White House tried to interfere in a Department of Justice evaluation of a merger, and somebody ended up going to jail. So I can assure you that any reasonable White House is absolutely going to understand the limits between what they can do in the White House and what the DOJ does as part of a civil enforcement investigation," she said.
"Those lines are very clear, and DOJ will stick to the facts and stick to the law, and I am sure that a President Hillary Clinton will want them to precisely that," she added.
Disclosure: Comcast is the owner of NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC and CNBC.com.