Trump said he doesn't see a recession after the bond market spooked investors and the Dow suffered its worst day of the year last week.Marketsread more
Amazon is raising seller fees for thousands of small and medium-sized businesses in France because of a new digital tax passed by the French government.Technologyread more
Ahead of the deadline, U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters that Huawei was a national security threat.Technologyread more
Baidu is gearing up to release its second-quarter earnings on Monday with the market expecting a sharp decline in profit.Technologyread more
Americans now say they approve of free trade by 64%-27%, a margin of better than two to one. That's up from 57%-37% early in Trump's presidency, and 51%-41% near the end of...Politicsread more
Stocks in Asia rose on Monday as U.S. Treasury yields bounced higher after plunging last week.Asia Marketsread more
The problem with tanking equities lies elsewhere, writes Michael Ivanovitch, because traders see no end to America's unfolding trade disputes with Europe and China.World Economyread more
Beijing wants to use reforms to support a slowing economy.China Marketsread more
Trump said Cook made a "good case" that it would be difficult for Apple to pay tariffs, when Samsung does not face the same hurdle because much of its manufacturing is in...Technologyread more
The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note briefly fell below the 2-year rate on Wednesday, a phenomenon in the bond market known as yield curve inversion, which is...Marketsread more
Despite aggressive strides, Waymo needs one thing before their self-driving cars become a seriously useful transportation system: people. We talked to the ones closest to it.Technologyread more
Donald Trump made energy a pillar of his economic policy, and now the president-elect is poised to unwind President Barack Obama's key climate change initiatives and potentially torpedo an international global warming initiative years in the making.
The change could happen quickly, too, in no small part because of the way the Obama administration advanced much of its own agenda.
Realizing early on that there was little he could accomplish through legislation while Republicans held both houses of Congress, Obama pieced together a large number of initiatives to reduce the country's greenhouse gas emissions and fossil fuel consumption, largely through regulation.
That means Trump can order regulators to stop enforcing the rules by using the same executive authority Obama exercised to set them in motion.
Here are the initiatives Trump has either said he will cancel or is likely to target in light of his promise to increase U.S. oil, gas, and coal production:
The Paris Agreement moved forward an effort by nearly 200 countries to reduce the impact of climate change by preventing global temperatures from rising above a certain level. Each country devises its own plans to meet its obligation to achieve that shared goal.
When the deal was reached last November, the United States pledged to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28 percent from its 2005 levels, by the year 2025.
Trump has said he will "cancel" the agreement. It would be remarkably easy to do just that. All he needs to do is stop enforcing Obama's climate initiatives.
In setting its goal, the United States factored in emissions reductions achieved through Obama-era rules. It would be virtually impossible to deliver on the Paris Agreement pledge without them.
The United States is the world's second largest energy consumer, so its withdrawal from the agreement would have significant implications for meeting the global goal.
Trump has pledged to scrap the Clean Power Plan, which seeks to reduce carbon pollution from power plants, primarily coal-fired units. The plan leaves it up to states to decide exactly how they will cut emissions from plants by 32 percent from 2005 levels by 2030.
Power plants are the single largest source of carbon pollution in the United States, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, so abandoning the plan would mark a significant setback in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
In February, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked the initiative from moving forward until lower court challenges from more than two dozen states and a number of industry groups are resolved.
The EPA claimed its authority to enforce the new rules was enshrined in the Clean Air Act, which gives the agency broad scope to create regulations to protect the public health by reducing airborne pollutants.
The Obama administration has already targeted some power plant pollutants with the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. The regulation put limits on mercury, arsenic and other toxic air pollutants and is particularly aimed at coal-fired plants.
Trump has not said much about MATS, but he has vowed to revive U.S. coal production by reducing regulatory burdens. MATS has contributed to the expedited retirement of some coal plants, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The EIA noted that 30 percent of the coal plant retirements for 2015 occurred when the regulations took effect in April.
Retirements tend to be among older and and lower capacity coal plants. The average coal unit retired in 2015 was 54 years old and produced 133 megawatts of net summer capacity. Coal units still operating average 38 years and produced 278 megawatts.
Trump would also end a moratorium on issuing new leases to mine for coal on federal land, which the Obama administration announced about two years ago.
This year, the EPA released rules aimed at cutting methane emissions from the oil and gas industry. The rules are meant to capture "fugitive" methane, a highly potent greenhouse gas that leaks from equipment or enters the atmosphere during hydraulic fracturing, the process of releasing oil and gas from shale rock by pummeling it with water, minerals and chemicals.
Trump has said he will strip energy regulations that get in the way of producing more oil and gas from U.S. fields.
The methane rules have already been challenged in court by a number of oil-producing states. Critics say the regulation is unnecessary, because many drillers are already tackling the problem themselves.
Scientists recently concluded that the oil and gas industry produced far more methane emissions than previously thought, but leaks from the sector did not drive the increase in overall emissions since 2007. That is because the industry has reduced leaks. But at the same time, efficiency gains were offset by the increased production of oil and gas.