May had failed to win a parliamentary majority on Britain's withdrawal from the European Union.Europe Politicsread more
Investors are rushing into the relative safe haven of the bond market, causing the yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury to plummet.Real Estateread more
China denounced U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for fabricating rumors after he said the chief executive of China's Huawei was lying about his company's ties to the...World Politicsread more
U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday predicted a swift end to the ongoing trade war with China, although no high-level talks have been scheduled between the two countries.World Economyread more
President Donald Trump has threatened tariffs on another $300 billion worth of Chinese goods — but Chinese PC-maker Lenovo is prepared to shift its production if that happens,...Technologyread more
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi won a landslide re-election victory. That could see India taking a more assertive security stance.Asia Politicsread more
The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, citing people familiar with the deal, reported that $30 million would go to plaintiffs and $14 million would be used to pay...Entertainmentread more
Danish shipping group A.P. Moller-Maersk on Friday posted first-quarter profit close to expectations and warned that trade tensions and slowing economic growth constitute...Earningsread more
Chinese technology giant Huawei has enough inventory to sustain its smartphone and 5G networking equipment business for most of the rest of the year, according to brokerage...Technologyread more
President Donald Trump on Thursday directed the U.S. intelligence community to "quickly and fully cooperate" with Attorney General William Barr's investigation into the...Politicsread more
Despite a decline in global commercial real estate markets, Asia-Pacific continues to enjoy a record-breaking growth — thanks to China, according to the Global Capital Flows...Real Estateread more
Oh, baby! You could end up paying a whole lot more for health insurance if you plan on — and actually end up — having a kid.
The Republican bill to replace Obamacare could lead to women in some states having to pay more than a whopping $1,000 per month extra for their health insurance plans if they want coverage for maternity care.
The bill would also cause some women to end up paying "thousands of dollars" extra on deductibles and other out-of-pocket health charges when they get pregnant and deliver a baby, according to an analysis.
The sobering financial impacts are revealed in the Congressional Budget Office's report on the latest version of the bill, known as the American Health Care Act.
The bill is expected to lead to 23 million more people becoming uninsured by 2026 than would be the case if Obamacare remained intact.
The CBO's analysis, released Wednesday, includes projections of the effects of several amendments made to the bill, which the House of Representatives passed by a margin of just a single "yes" vote May 4.
One of those amendments, designed to lower premiums for some customers who purchase individual health plans, was added to attract support for the bill from conservatives.
The amendment would allow states to apply for waivers for insurers to let them charge people with pre-existing health conditions higher prices for coverage than healthier people who also buy insurance coverage outside of their job.
It also would allow insurers in states that get waivers to strip out certain minimum health benefits that Obamacare currently requires them to include in their health plans.
The CBO on Wednesday said that before the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, became law, there were just 18 states that required insurance plans to offer maternity care as part of their coverage.
The report said, "States that previously mandated fewer benefits would be more likely to apply for a waiver" to allow insurers to drop such currently mandated benefits if the Republican bill becomes law.
As a result, the CBO said, people living in states that eliminated maternity coverage as a required benefit, along with other services, "would experience substantial increases in out-of-pocket spending on health care or would choose to forego the services."
"In particular, out-of-pocket spending on maternity care and mental health and substance abuse services could increase by thousands of dollars in a given year for the nongroup enrollees who would use those services," the report said. Nongroup customers are people who get insurance from a private plan outside of a job.
The CBO noted that in some states where maternity care would be eliminated as an essential health benefit, insurers could end up offering women a so-called rider to their insurance plans to cover maternity care, at extra cost, on top of the regular monthly premium.
"Insurers would expect most purchasers to use the benefits and would therefore price that rider at close to the average cost of maternity coverage, which could be more than $1,000 per month," the report said.
The CBO noted that "the average cost of pregnancy care and delivery is about $17,000 for women with private insurance coverage."
"Alternatively," the report added, "insurers could offer a lower-cost rider providing less-than-comprehensive coverage — with, for example, a $2,000 limit."
But "either type of rider would result in substantially higher out-of-pocket health-care costs for pregnant women who purchased insurance in the nongroup market," the report said.
The report from the CBO sparked sharp criticism of the bill from advocacy groups.
The CBO "analysis ... confirms what we already know: the so-called American Health Care Act is a cruel attack on the health and well-being of women and families," said Andrea Miller, president of the National Institute for Reproductive Health. "Twenty-three million Americans would lose coverage under this sorry excuse for a replacement for the Affordable Care Act."
"Calling the AHCA a 'health care' bill is an oxymoron — it would drastically impede access to health care for the people who need it most," Miller said.
Miller said that passage of the bill "would have a severe impact on women's health care and their families' economic stability."
Dr. Anne Davis, consulting medical director of Physicians for Reproductive Health, said the report shows that the GOP bill "still takes insurance for millions of families off of the table."
"Comprehensive reproductive health care would still move out of reach, especially for millions of low-income people, because of this bill's attacks on Medicaid, Planned Parenthood and abortion coverage," Davis said.