- Former assistant special Watergate prosecutor Nick Ackerman says Trump obstructed justice, but ex-Whitewater counsel Robert Ray disagrees.
- "Obstruction of justice is an intent crime. If his intent was to impede, interfere or stop that investigation, that's obstruction," Ackerman said.
- However, Ray said Trump didn't issue a directive or an order to the FBI director to end any investigation, and even if he did, it still wouldn't be criminal obstruction.
There's "no question" President Donald Trump was involved in an obstruction of justice in his dealings with former FBI Director James Comey, former assistant special Watergate prosecutor Nick Ackerman told CNBC on Thursday.
"The Comey testimony today makes that crystal clear," Ackerman said in an interview with "Closing Bell."
Comey testified before a Senate committee on Thursday that he believed Trump ordered him to drop the probe into former national security advisor Michael Flynn when they spoke in February.
He recalled that the president said, "I hope you can see your way clear to
Trump fired Comey on May 9.
"Obstruction of justice is an intent crime. If his intent was to impede, interfere or stop that investigation, that's obstruction," Ackerman said.
What's more, he thinks there was a motive. He said he doesn't believe "for a minute" that Flynn had dealings with Russia on his own, without Trump knowing about it.
"The bottom line is the president is worried that Mike Flynn is going to turn into the next James McCord, the Watergate burglar who wound up getting a heavy sentence and then fingering the people in the White House," Ackerman said.
He believes it all adds up to "one big obstruction of justice."
Trump's personal lawyer, Marc Kasowitz, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment but released a statement earlier Thursday afternoon after Comey's testimony.
Kasowitz said Comey was lying and that Trump never "directed or suggested that Mr. Comey
Robert Ray, former independent counsel for the Whitewater investigation, believes the notion that Trump's actions amount to criminal obstruction of justice is "far-fetched."
"Whatever the president's hopes and intimations were, he didn't issue a directive or an order to the FBI director to end any investigation," Ray told "Closing Bell."
And even if it were true that the president actually ordered the FBI director to halt an investigation, it still isn't obstruction of justice, he added.
"The president is entitled to do that. You may not like it. The Congress might decide that is grounds for an impeachable offense, but it is not criminal obstruction of justice," said Ray.
—CNBC's Jacob Pramuk contributed to this report.