Americans now say they approve of free trade by 64%-27%, a margin of better than two to one. That's up from 57%-37% early in Trump's presidency, and 51%-41% near the end of...Politicsread more
The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note briefly fell below the 2-year rate on Wednesday, a phenomenon in the bond market known as yield curve inversion, which is...Marketsread more
The MacBook Pro recall and its subsequent ban from flights underscores the increasing brand risk from problems with lithium-ion batteries.Technologyread more
Experts say the timing of Amazon executives' contributions to Rep. David Cicilline likely reflect the company's heightened urgency over growing regulatory scrutiny.Technologyread more
CNBC combed through Wall Street research to see which stocks are still a buy after their earnings reports.Marketsread more
Despite aggressive strides, Waymo needs one thing before their self-driving cars become a seriously useful transportation system: people. We talked to the ones closest to it.Technologyread more
Coinbase security chief Philip Martin explains, "Possession of a key is possession of your currency. What that means is that you can't revoke a cryptocurrency key, if that key...Technologyread more
Fraud investigator Harry Markopolos' accusations extended beyond GE's management to actuaries, auditors and analysts who he claims overlooked billions in liabilities.Marketsread more
The Supreme Court could strike down the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency Elizabeth Warren has likened to her child and which Justice...2020 Electionsread more
Bianco Research's James Bianco suggests Wall Street is desperately looking for a signal that a 50 basis point cut is coming next month.Trading Nationread more
The company's S-1 lays the groundwork for what is widely expected to be one of the largest initial public offerings of the year, second only to Uber's IPO in May. It's also...Technologyread more
Waiting for the day you'll be able to take financial firms to court? Don't hold your breath.
A new consumer-protection rule that would make it easier for customers to sue banks, credit-card companies and other lenders is now facing its own legal attack. A lawsuit filed Friday by a coalition of business groups — led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce — challenges the rule and requests a delay in its March 19, 2018, compliance date.
The move comes as Senate Republican leaders appear to be a few votes shy of what's needed to pass a House-approved measure to overturn it.
Congress this week is grilling Wells Fargo and Equifax executives about their respective failures related to consumer-protection issues, which some Washington watchers say makes for a poor backdrop to a vote on the resolution. Under the Congressional Review Act, lawmakers have until mid-November to act.
Consumer advocates dispute critics who say the rule lines the pockets of trial lawyers — who typically get a sizable piece of the pie in class-action lawsuit awards — instead of benefiting customers.
"This is all really about [these companies] making it as hard as possible to let consumers have legal recourse," said Michael Best, director of advocacy outreach for the Consumer Federation of America. "It's not realistic, fair or effective to expect consumers to one by one hold large corporations accountable through arbitration."
The rule bans financial institutions from requiring customer disputes to be handled via arbitration. Instead, consumers would be able to file a lawsuit on their own against a financial company or join a class action. Mandatory arbitration clauses already are prohibited in mortgage contracts yet have remained enforceable in other agreements, such as those for credit cards and auto loans.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Dallas against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, argues that the agency failed to follow federal law in its rule-making process and used faulty research, among other charges. The CFPB issued its final rule in July.
A spokesman for the CFPB declined to comment.
The expectation is that business groups will soon file a motion asking the court to put a hold on the rule while it is under judicial review.
"They'll want to tee up this issue as soon as they can," said Alan Kaplinsky, a partner with national law firm Ballard Spahr. "There are a lot of things companies would have to do to comply with the rule by March so it needs to get going before it gets too close to that date."