"Whilst there is a big dispute at the moment, I think there's also potential for resolution," UBS chairman Axel Weber says of the U.S.-China trade negotiations.World Economyread more
The Kingdom and oil and gas industry have been slow to shore up defenses, raising red flags about the possibility of longer term fall-out in the region.Technologyread more
Tensions between South Korea and Japan may ultimately disrupt the high-end tech sectors, says Heenam Choi, CEO at South Korea's sovereign wealth fund.Traderead more
On Sunday, the 71st Primetime Emmy Awards will honor the best comedies, dramas, limited and variety series from the last year.Entertainmentread more
Removing Neumann is a difficult decision for Son, who has long believed in WeWork and Neumann's vision to quickly expand the company.Technologyread more
Datadog went public on Thursday and instantly hit a $10 billion valuation, becoming the fourth cloud software debut to reach that level this year.Technologyread more
There are challenges with Iran, North Korea, the Afghan Taliban, Israel and the Palestinians — not to mention a number of trade pacts.Politicsread more
Blackstone Executive Vice Chairman Tony James says he's less optimistic now than before that the U.S.-China trade war could be resolved, but even a smaller deal could help...World Economyread more
In his new memoir, "The Ride of a Lifetime," Iger explains why he decided against the deal to buy Twitter.Technologyread more
In perhaps Buffett's first televised profile, he explained a method of investing that prioritizes bargains and makes use of an occasional baseball analogy.Marketsread more
Gluskin Sheff's David Rosenberg reinforces his recession forecast following the Federal Reserve's September meeting.Futures Nowread more
As they search for ways to join the Republican tax cut push, self-styled "deficit hawk" senators have raised questions that appear to make no sense.
Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, for example, vows to oppose any bill that increases the deficit by even a penny. Yet the budget framework for tax cuts that he helped design expressly permits $1.5 trillion in higher deficits over the next 10 years.
In other words, Corker's tax cut demand seems to directly contradict his budget outline.
A lot, actually.
Corker insists a tax cut that seems to expand the deficit by $1.5 trillion under budget rules may not, in the real world, expand the deficit at all. He cites two different reasons stemming from how deficits are measured and forecast.
The first involves roughly $500 billion in temporary tax cuts that are set to expire but that Congress usually extends. Budget rules assume they expire — as they do under current law. That, in turn, increases the amount of projected revenue and reduces the amount of projected deficits by $500 billion before tax cuts are taken into account.
Republicans assume instead that those provisions would be extended – as under current policy. That reduces expected revenue and increases projected deficits in the absence of tax cuts.
Using that assumption, Corker and other Republicans insist one-third of the $1.5 trillion tax cut is already baked into the government's books.
The second reason concerns projections for economic growth. The budget framework measures $1 trillion in revenue lost from tax cuts on a "static" basis. Static estimates don't attempt to calculate whether tax cuts generate additional economic growth and revenues.
Republicans leaders prefer "dynamic" estimates reflecting the effects of growth. In the current debate, they insist that GOP tax cut plans will generate at least $1 trillion in additional revenues.
Those two assumptions – that $500 billion of higher deficits is already booked, and that tax cuts generate $1 trillion in extra revenue – are how Republicans claim a $1.5 trillion tax cut under budget rules won't increase the deficit at all.
But that's only in theory. Favorable assumptions haven't resolved the deficit drama. Corker and other Republicans such as Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma remain unconvinced the tax cut bill will indeed generate the $1 trillion in revenue they need.
To assuage their doubts, they want a deficit "trigger" in the tax cut bill. Such a provision would force tax increases if deficits later prove higher than expected.
It's unclear whether and how such a trigger would work. But the deficit hawks have good reason to fear they will need one.
The University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton budget model, overseen by a former economist for President George W. Bush, projects new revenue from the Senate's tax cuts in the range of $117 billion to $368 billion. That's not even close to enough to keep the deficit from rising.
Similarly, 88 percent of top economists surveyed by the University of Chicago project substantially higher deficits and debt from the House and Senate GOP bills. Only the Tax Foundation — an outlier among economists for the aggressiveness of its dynamic scoring methods — has projected a 10-year revenue increase of at least $1 trillion from the Senate bill.
Broadly shared expectations of higher deficits help explain why Republicans aren't waiting for analyses by professional career economists within the government.
The Treasury Department has not released its own forecast. Senate leaders aim to pass their bill this week even though the Joint Committee on Taxation, the official scorekeeper of Congress, hasn't completed its "dynamic" growth estimates for the bill.
But senators may receive those estimates whether they want them or not. In a letter Tuesday to Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the Joint Committee's top staffer said his colleagues were racing to produce them as early as Wednesday evening.