Saturday's attack is the biggest on Saudi oil infrastructure since Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait in 1990.Energyread more
Saudi Aramco is aiming to restore by Monday about a third of its crude output that was disrupted after drone attacks on two key oil facilities, The Wall Street Journal...Marketsread more
"Blaming Iran won't end disaster. Accepting our April '15 proposal to end war & begin talks may," Zarif said on Twitter.Energyread more
Oil prices are expected to jump as much as $10 per barrel after a coordinated drone strike hit Saudi Arabia's largest oil field, forcing the kingdom to cut its oil output in...Marketsread more
Apple's new iPhones can still send texts, download apps, and make video calls, but the company spends a lot of time and effort marketing its new phones as powerful photography...Technologyread more
The trucking industry is worth hundreds of billions of dollars per year. Uber is going after this market with Uber Freight, an online platform that matches truckers with...Technologyread more
Some U.S. manufacturers say tariffs, if targeted, will help address longstanding unfair trade practices like intellectual property theft.Traderead more
Supporters of a $15 minimum wage ballot initiative in Florida argue the state's inflation-tied pay hikes have not gone far enough.2020 Electionsread more
Saudi Arabia shut down half its oil production Saturday after drone strikes hit the world's largest oil processing facility in an attack claimed by Yemen's Houthi rebels.Politicsread more
Trusii's hydrogen water machines were supposed to help users with their health problems, but customers claim the company is involved in a giant scam.Technologyread more
The decoupling of the world's two weightiest economies seems as inescapable as its extent and global impact remains incalculable.Politicsread more
When House Intelligence Committee Republicans sent a classified memo to President Donald Trump for a public release, they sidestepped a potentially lengthy disclosure process with an arcane rule that had never before been successfully used.
The rule itself, known by some as "Rule X" for its location within the 10th rule of the House of Representatives, gave the committee the ability to "disclose publicly any information in its possession" following a vote within five days of a member's request.
On Monday, the memo passed a party-line vote for disclosure.
The document being disclosed — in this case, a hotly contested memo alleging anti-Trump bias and surveillance application abuse from the agencies investigating Russian election interference — was then sent to the president.
But even if Trump hadn't gone on the record supporting the release of the memo, House Republicans on the committee could have disclosed the memo on their own.
Rule X gives the committee the ability to disclose classified information unilaterally after five days, so long as the president doesn't object to the decision. If Trump did want to keep the document classified, he could have objected by providing a written statement outlining the national security threats that such a disclosure posed.
Even then, the committee would have been able to vote to send the memo to the full House of Representatives, which would then have its own vote on whether or not to release it.
The rule, which sidesteps the usual disclosure process that allows U.S. intelligence agencies to review the materials in question, has never been used before, according to a May 18 report from Jennifer Elsea of the Congressional Research Service.
"It does not appear that either house has invoked its procedure for disclosing classified information," Elsea said in the report. A spokeswoman from the Congressional Research Service did not respond to CNBC's request for comment.
It may not be the first time lawmakers considered using Rule X to force the release of classified documents, however.
Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, told CNBC that former Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., had thought about using the rule during his long-running push to release 28 redacted pages from a congressional commission's report on the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. And the rule was also considered during the years-long process of declassifying thousands of pages of CIA interrogation documents, Aftergood said.
In the case of the surveillance memo, which grew into a political conflagration ahead of its public release on Friday, Aftergood described the House Intelligence Committee of "basically saying, 'We don't need your permission, we're going to do it anyway.'"
The premise is that the national interest justifies circumventing the more involved declassification review process. But Republicans on the committee, led by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., who worked on Trump's presidential transition team, did not vote to release another document from Democrats reportedly offering supplemental information on the same topic.
The Democrats' memo was reported to counter the memo proffered by Republicans, which minority committee members considered "misleading."
"To me, it reveals the explicitly partisan character of this activity," Aftergood said. "It is intended to advance a particular narrative, and to block criticism of that narrative."