Trump said he will raise tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese goods to 30% and hike duties on another $300 billion in products to 15%.Politicsread more
Stocks dropped after Donald Trump ordered that U.S. manufacturers find alternatives to their operations in China.US Marketsread more
Federal Reserve Vice Chair Richard Clarida said Friday that the global economy has deteriorated in the past month.Marketsread more
The latest escalation in the trade war ups the odds the economy will fall into recession and that the Fed will aggressively cut rates.Market Insiderread more
Here are the products that stand to be the most affected by China's new tariffs on $75 billion worth of U.S. goods.Marketsread more
"We don't need China and, frankly, would be far better off without them," Trump tweeted.Politicsread more
"My only question is, who is our bigger enemy, Jay Powell or Chairman Xi?" Trump wrote amid a series of tweets that rattled markets Friday.Politicsread more
"I would love this to be clarified. We come to a deal on trade, boy, this market is up 10 to 15%, but without it's going to be worrisome," Jeremy Siegel says.Marketsread more
The final week of August could be highly volatile as markets fret over the economy and the latest developments in trade wars.Market Insiderread more
The death comes as federal and state health officials investigate a slew of lung illnesses in connection to e-cigarette use.Health and Scienceread more
Bank of England Governor Mark Carney says trade war has a confidence effect on business around the worldMarketsread more
The U.S. isn't alone in its frustration with Chinese trade policy, and the Trump administration should take advantage of that, former U.S. trade officials told CNBC on Thursday after the U.S. imposed new tariffs on $16 billion worth of Chinese imports.
"I think the Chinese underestimated how frustrated and serious, not only the United States, but the entire global community, is with their practices that they need to change," Bruce Andrews, former U.S. deputy secretary of Commerce under President Obama, said on CNBC's "Squawk Alley."
From forcing foreign companies to enter into local joint ventures with Chinese companies to discriminatory subsidies and requiring foreign business to subject intellectual property to government checks, China's trade policies have burdened more than just the United States. Although the U.S. shares many of its grievances with its allies in the World Trade Organization, President Donald Trump has used almost every other weapon in his arsenal, said Benn Steil, author and Council on Foreign Relations director of economics.
"One tool the administration amazingly hasn't used is the WTO. They disparaged the WTO, but they have allies in Europe, in Latin America, in Asia who would join them in the trade action against China," Steil said on "Squawk Alley." "But instead they're talking about potentially pulling out, and I think it's a mistake."
The U.S. is currently in negotiations over a new NAFTA agreement with Mexico, but without Canada, which has historically been the closest ally of the U.S. Meanwhile, the Trump administration and China reopened trade talks on Wednesday, one day before a new round of U.S. tariffs on $16 billion worth of Chinese imports kicked in, prompting an equivalent retaliation from Beijing.
Carla Hills, the former U.S. trade representative who negotiated the first version of the North American Free Trade Agreement during the Bush administration, agreed that the Trump administration could be getting more effective results if it had the support of its allies when negotiating with China.
"We should have joined hands with our allies and confronted China about its discrimination, and its not giving us national treatment, because all of our allies were suffering the same problems," she said on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street."
"You win more when you sit down to try to negotiate, and you particularly win more when the rest of the developed world, representing all of the markets that China wants to use, are sitting beside you," she added.
Hills argued that a confrontational approach would only hurt the economies of both countries, and that there really shouldn't be winners and losers in trade at all.
Hurting China "should not be one of our objectives. We don't want either one of these economies to lose, we want a win-win situation," Hills said.
Regardless of the method of negotiation, Steil said he doesn't see a deal in sight until fall at the earliest, which means more pain to come on both sides.
Andrews agreed, "I think that both sides are actually underestimating the ability of the other side to endure pain."