These are the stocks posting the largest moves before the bell.Market Insiderread more
The Federal Reserve's expected interest rate cuts appears to have impacted J.P. Morgan's forecast for 2019 net interest income.Financeread more
Credit card sales volume rose 11% this quarter and merchant processing volume increased 12%, the bank says in its earnings statement.Banksread more
Current and former Tesla employees working in the company's open-air "tent" factory say they felt pressure to take shortcuts to hit aggressive Model 3 production goals,...Technologyread more
KeyCorp said in an 8-K filing the fraud involves a "business customer" and was discovered "on or about" July 9.Banksread more
GE hasn't had a year this good during this millennium. After that massive surge, one trader is warning investors to stay away.Trading Nationread more
Domino's Pizza stock fell Tuesday after reporting disappointing sales, despite beating Wall Street's earnings estimates.Restaurantsread more
Here are the biggest calls on Wall Street on TuesdayInvestingread more
Johnson & Johnson's profit jumped 42% in the second quarter, with all three of the sprawling health-care company's businesses performing better than Wall Street expected.Health and Scienceread more
President Donald Trump and the RNC are picking up key supporters in the business community who did not back him as a candidate in 2016.2020 Electionsread more
Facebook knew that it was providing inaccurate data on ad viewership for over a year before telling clients in 2016, according to an updated lawsuit filed on Tuesday. And the problem was much worse than what Facebook reported.
In September 2016, Facebook admitted the that it overestimated video ad viewing time averages by up to 60 percent to 80 percent for two years because of a calculation error. According to the lawsuit, which a group of small social media agencies and marketing consultants initially filed in a California court October 2016, Facebook wasn't sharing the whole picture.
The plaintiffs claim that Facebook inflated ad viewing time averages by 150 percent to 900 percent, much higher than reported. When Facebook discovered the issue, it stalled fixing it for more than a year while it came up with a plan to make it seem like it wasn't a big problem, the lawsuit says.
"But rather than correct the metrics immediately in January 2015 and tell advertisers, Facebook recognized that 'a 40% drop will be too significant and might hurt user trust,'" the lawsuit claims.
Facebook said it only learned of the issue in August 2016, and it fixed it before making the statement public the next month. Facebook also said it did not overcharge marketers.
In an emailed statement to CNBC, Facebook said the lawsuit is without merit and the company has filed a motion to dismiss the claims.
"Suggestions that we in any way tried to hide this issue from our partners are false," Facebook said. "We told our customers about the error when we discovered it — and updated our help center to explain the issue."
The plaintiffs are requesting compensatory, punitive damages, legal fees and other relief, but did not disclose an amount.