Trump's remarks came a day before the Fed was set to announce its next decision on interest rates.Politicsread more
The U.S. and China have imposed tariffs on billions of dollars' worth of one another's goods since the start of 2018.Traderead more
More and more American firms are calling for the Trump administration to resolve its conflict with China.World Economyread more
In a tweet, Trump said that he and Xi "had a very good telephone conversation," and that "our respective teams will begin talks prior to our meeting."Politicsread more
China is reducing support for its electric carmakers a move experts and industry insiders warn could lead to consolidation and waning investor appetite. But some of the...Technologyread more
Is your CEO on the list? Glassdoor has the results.Power Playersread more
Joseph Gaspar, the chief financial officer at Elbit Systems, said M&A among firms in the sector began to pick up pace in the 1980s and looks set to continue.Paris Air Showread more
Stocks in Asia rose on Wednesday following positive developments overnight on the U.S.-China trade front.Asia Marketsread more
The U.S. Department of Defense has hit back at Russian officials who have criticized a U.S. plan to deploy more troops to the Middle East.World Politicsread more
Signs of companies moving out of Hong Kong have emerged, members of the business community told CNBC following massive protests in the city. But one analyst said Hong Kong's...China Politicsread more
Sen. Josh Hawley, a well-known tech critic, introduced legislation on Wednesday that would remove the immunity big technology companies receive for user-posted content under...Technologyread more
Leaving the European Union without a transitional trade deal would cost Britain about 6 percent of GDP -- roughly four years of economic growth -- compared with staying in the bloc, the International Monetary Fund said on Wednesday.
The IMF, which warned of the costs of Brexit before Britons voted to leave in June 2016, said securing a trade deal would roughly halve the economic damage from trade barriers and reduced foreign investment and immigration.
"Directors emphasized the importance of a timely agreement with the EU, accompanied by an implementation period to avoid a cliff-edge exit in March 2019 and to allow firms and workers time to adjust to the new relationship," the IMF said.
Two months ago, IMF managing director Christine Lagarde said she expected the world's fifth-biggest economy would shrink outright if it left the EU without a deal.
The IMF's estimates -- part of a regular review of Britain's economy -- come as Prime Minister Theresa May is attempting to secure her top ministers' agreement to a transitional deal, which will then need approval by parliament and the EU.
Some supporters of Brexit have argued that Britain would be better off leaving without any deal with Brussels if they cannot secure their full demands, trading instead under World Trade Organization rules.
The IMF forecast this would carry a cost. "In a scenario in which the UK and EU trade under World Trade Organization rules the level of output is likely to fall by between about 5 and 8 percent relative to a no-Brexit scenario, with an average of about 6 percent," the IMF said.
Britain's economy has slowed since the Brexit vote. Its annual growth rate fell from the top of the G7 group of nations to near the bottom, as businesses put investment on hold and higher inflation reduced households' disposable income.
Some euroskeptics in May's Conservative Party say a "no-deal" Brexit would allow Britain to reach trade deals with third countries more easily and determine its own regulations.
But May favors a transitional arrangement that she hopes will preserve free trade in goods, though not services, while placing controls on immigration from the EU.
The IMF said this type of free trade agreement would reduce British GDP by around 2.5 to 4 percent -- probably about 3 percent -- over an unspecified long-term period, compared with staying in the EU. May has ruled out staying in.
Before the referendum, the IMF estimated Brexit would have a short-run cost of between 1.4 percent and 5.6 percent of GDP, depending on the terms of departure.
The effect of Brexit would vary widely between industries, the IMF said.
Britain's financial services, chemicals and automotive industries were likely to suffer most from new regulatory barriers and disrupted supply chains. By contrast, farms, food processors and oil and mining companies might do better.
Government programs would be needed to retrain British workers for these jobs, the IMF added.