Trump said he will raise tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese goods to 30% and hike duties on another $300 billion in products to 15%.Politicsread more
Stocks dropped after Donald Trump ordered that U.S. manufacturers find alternatives to their operations in China.US Marketsread more
Federal Reserve Vice Chair Richard Clarida said Friday that the global economy has deteriorated in the past month.Marketsread more
The latest escalation in the trade war ups the odds the economy will fall into recession and that the Fed will aggressively cut rates.Market Insiderread more
Here are the products that stand to be the most affected by China's new tariffs on $75 billion worth of U.S. goods.Marketsread more
"We don't need China and, frankly, would be far better off without them," Trump tweeted.Politicsread more
"My only question is, who is our bigger enemy, Jay Powell or Chairman Xi?" Trump wrote amid a series of tweets that rattled markets Friday.Politicsread more
"I would love this to be clarified. We come to a deal on trade, boy, this market is up 10 to 15%, but without it's going to be worrisome," Jeremy Siegel says.Marketsread more
The final week of August could be highly volatile as markets fret over the economy and the latest developments in trade wars.Market Insiderread more
Tesla solar energy systems reportedly ignited at an Amazon warehouse in Redlands, California last June, and the Seattle e-commerce titan confirmed that it has no further plans...Technologyread more
The death comes as federal and state health officials investigate a slew of lung illnesses in connection to e-cigarette use.Health and Scienceread more
A trade deal between the United States and China — which may be just around the corner — could be derailed by a "temptation to game the system," a former U.S. diplomat and ambassador told CNBC on Friday.
While there's a "strong likelihood" that the two sides will be able to hammer out a deal, there are a few factors that could derail its prospects, said Frank Lavin, who formerly served as U.S. under secretary of commerce for international trade.
"There's always a temptation for someone to game the system. If you and I are in an agreement, and we're there and we're going to sign tomorrow, I always have an incentive to say, 'Why don't I just take my offer down one percent?' And you're already at the table, you're already set for celebration, and let me just see if I can do this," said Lavin, who is now chief executive of business consultancy Export Now.
In particular, there's potential for "gamesmanship" when it comes to trade concessions that will be "painful for China," involving the trickier intellectual property issues, according to Lavin, who was also U.S. ambassador to Singapore.
"But on some of the IP issues — we're going to end compulsory licensing, or end compulsory sharing of IP data — that's a little harder to enforce, because what is compulsory? There might not be anything formally legal that requires it, but there might be incentives, or pressure, or say, you want to build a new plant in China, can we really go along with it?" he said.
"So the scope for gamesmanship, I think, with some of these issues, and that's going to be where the U.S. does have to discipline the system, and ... police what's going on," Lavin added.
And while some parts of the deal may require external enforcement, the elements of an agreement that are less painful for China are likely to see a "self-enforcing, self-discipline" type of system, Lavin said.
"Because look, lower tariffs help China, they help the consumers, they temper inflation. So, that's easy to live with, and it's very visible, very transparent," he said.
China earlier this month announced it would lower tariffs on some imported consumer goods ranging from computers to furniture and bicycles.
Yet Lavin warned that there could be some unforeseen hiccups in the negotiations as the deal nears its completion.
"There's going to be some party — we won't know till we see the details — that's not pulled into the lifeboat," Lavin said. "No deal is comprehensive, always there's some issue or group or segment that isn't addressed. And so they are going to scream bloody murder."
Negotiators from both sides met in Beijing on Wednesday for talks, after which Chinese Vice Premier Liu He will be in Washington for talks next week.
Both sides have met several times in a bid to hammer out a deal to end their trade war. The talks have focused on a range of issues, including economic structural reforms and the systemic coercion of Western companies to hand over their advanced technologies in exchange for market access.
Some sticking points are reportedly still up in the air, such as how the agreement would be enforced, and disputes as to whether to remove existing tariffs or keep them in place as a way to maintain some pressure on both parties to stick to the terms of the deal.
Although the trade war has been blamed for periods of volatility over the last year, the markets have largely already come to assume that a deal will be struck, according to Kelvin Lau, senior economist for global research at Standard Chartered.
That is, news of an agreement would be unlikely to send markets higher, he explained. But after any deal is announced, investors will be closely scrutinizing the details, such as the type of penalty imposed on China should it fail to keep to the terms, he added.
Regardless, some type of deal is likely to be reached, Lavin said, because that's in the best interest of U.S. President Donald Trump: "He's the one who lit the fire ... He's now has a huge incentive to say ... I fixed it. It's now the best trade deal ever."
"He'll want to take a few victory laps on this," Lavin added.