It is a rare scenario where long-term interest rates suddenly fall below short-term interest rates.Real Estateread more
Arturo Estrella has a message for recession naysayers: It could hit sooner than you think.Marketsread more
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell faces the tough challenge of presenting a unified voice on Fed policy from the most divided Fed in years.Market Insiderread more
Overstock CEO Partick Byrne has resigned from the e-commerce company after making comments about his role in the "deep state."Technologyread more
It was the third trigger of the recession indicator in less than two weeks.Bondsread more
Automakers are trying to deal with President Trump's efforts to roll back Obama-era fuel efficiency rules.Autosread more
Mark Zuckerberg has been on a selling spree in August and has unloaded $526 million worth of stock this year.Technologyread more
Palantir CEO Alex Karp said billionaire investor Peter Thiel is right to question Google's decision to work in China, while abandoning military contracts in the US.Technologyread more
These are the stocks posting the largest moves midday.Market Insiderread more
U.S. manufacturer growth slowed to the lowest level in almost 10 years in August, the latest sign that the trade war may be exacerbating the economic slowdown.Marketsread more
L Brands shares fell by as much as 12% at one point, touching $17.61 — a price not seen since December 2009.Retailread more
LONDON, May 9 (Reuters) - Britain's economy will be around 3 percent poorer over the long term if it leaves the European Union and retains a customs union with the bloc, the option favoured by the opposition Labour Party, academic forecasters predicted on Thursday.
The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said the long-run loss after 10 years, compared to staying in the EU, would be equivalent to around 800 pounds ($1,040) per person per year.
"Leaving the EU for a customs union will make it more costly for the UK to trade with a large market on our doorstep, particularly in services which make up 80 percent of our economy," NIESR economist Garry Young said.
A customs union would allow goods to flow across the border more easily than if Britain left the EU with no deal at all, but it would not guarantee frictionless trade and would limit Britains capacity to strike its own free trade deals.
NIESR's report did not look at the option favoured by Prime Minister Theresa May, which would see a looser EU trading relationship than a customs union.
After May's deal was rejected three times in parliament, forcing her to delay Brexit, the government has spent more than four weeks in talks with Labour - so far without reaching any agreement.
NIESR, Britain's best known academic economic forecasters, said overall gross domestic product 10 years after Brexit would be 3.1 percent lower in a customs union scenario than if Britain stayed in the EU, and tax revenues would fall by 2.9 percent.
Lower immigration would limit the per capita reduction in GDP to 2.3 percent, equivalent to 800 pounds per head.
Britain's finance ministry estimated in November that the government's preferred policy would reduce per capita GDP by 2.1-2.7 percent, depending on the effect on immigration, though its assumptions are not directly comparable with NIESR's.
"We know that the terms on which the UK will trade with the EU after Brexit will not be as favourable to the UK as they are now," NIESR said. "This would discourage investment in the UK and ultimately mean that UK workers were less productive than they would have been if the UK had stayed in the EU."
Brexit supporters argue that outside the EU and its customs union, Britain would find it easier to strike deals with economies that are growing faster than the EU's, even if they account for a fairly small share of British trade at present.
Most economists think the benefits of this are likely to be significantly outweighed by reduced access to markets in the EU, currently Britain's biggest trading partner. ($1 = 0.7691 pounds) (Reporting by David Milliken)