The company's S-1 lays the groundwork for what is widely expected to be one of the largest initial public offerings of the year, second only to Uber's IPO in May. It's also...Technologyread more
Fraud investigator Harry Markopolos' accusations extended beyond GE's management to actuaries, auditors and analysts who he claims overlooked billions in liabilities.Marketsread more
Trump's tweet comes a day after Apple put out a press release describing the money it spends on U.S.-based suppliers and vendors.Technologyread more
CNBC combed through Wall Street research to see which stocks are still a buy after their earnings reports.Marketsread more
President Donald Trump held a call on Wednesday with the CEOs of three major U.S. banks, according to people with knowledge of the situation.Marketsread more
Despite aggressive strides, Waymo needs one thing before their self-driving cars become a seriously useful transportation system: people. We talked to the ones closest to it.Technologyread more
Scientists say the smoke plumes, filled with megatons of tiny, harmful particles, could travel to other areas of the world and cause serious respiratory problems for people.Weather & Natural Disastersread more
Some Weight Watchers loyalists applaud Kurbo by WW. But nutritionists worry Kurbo promotes an unhealthy relationship with food during an especially impressionable time.Health and Scienceread more
Benefits from what President Trump called "the biggest reform of all time" to the tax code have dwindled to a faint breeze just 20 months after its enactment, writes John...Politicsread more
Epstein, 66, was found in his cell in Manhattan federal lockup Saturday morning and transferred to a nearby hospital, where he was subsequently pronounced dead.Politicsread more
Air travelers faced delays at U.S. airports on Friday afternoon after a computer issue snarled processing of international arrivals.Airlinesread more
The House voted Wednesday night to pass a bill that would scrap Obamacare's so-called Cadillac tax, an inactive provision of the health law meant to help control health-care spending.
The tax, set to go into effect in 2022, is unpopular with both Republicans and Democrats, who say it punishes the middle class.
The "Middle Class Health Benefits Tax Repeal Act of 2019" had more than 350 co-sponsors and was expected to pass the Democratic-controlled House on Wednesday afternoon. Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., who introduced the bill earlier this year and has spent years trying to repeal the provision in the health law, has said the tax would put workers and their families' health coverage at risk.
The bill easily passed with 419 lawmakers voting yes.
"Passage of this bill will lift the shadow that overhangs employer-sponsored plans and stop the high deductible trend from worsening," Courtney said Wednesday afternoon before the vote. "I am hopeful an overwhelming tally tonight will send a laser light message to the Senate to adopt this bill as soon as possible."
The provision imposes a tax on employment-based health insurance coverage that exceeds certain thresholds — $10,200 for individual coverage and $27,500 for family coverage. All health insurance benefits paid by employers above that amount would be taxed at 40%.
The provision was meant to slow overall health spending by discouraging employees from selecting pricey insurance plans with lavish health benefits that could encourage overusing medical services. It was also designed to generate revenue for the U.S. government, which would then use that money to fund other Obamacare programs.
The tax "has a strong policy rationale," wrote Paul Van de Water, senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a Washington think tank. "In fact, it's one of the ACA's most important cost-containment measures. It will discourage employers and employees from buying unusually high-cost health coverage that promotes the excess use of health care."
Repealing it would also cause the U.S. to lose a "substantial amount of money and add to our deficit," he added in an interview with CNBC.
But lawmakers and labor unions were concerned the tax would cause employers to reduce health benefits or burden workers with an increase in cost-sharing. There are also concerns it would unfairly target high-cost health plans that cover people in poorer health or people who live in areas where health costs are high.
The Kaiser Family Foundation found that 21% of employers who offer high-cost health plans would be affected when the the Cadillac tax is expected to go into effect in 2022. The percentage of employer plans reaching the threshold will grow to 37% by 2030, KFF said.
Implementation of the tax has been delayed twice by Congress — once in 2015 and again in 2018 as part of a spending bill.
If the tax is fully repealed, it could cost the U.S. an estimated $193 billion over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. It's unknown whether the Senate will consider the bill but a Senate version of the repeal has more than 40 co-sponsors.
The vote Wednesday comes as a Trump administration-backed lawsuit attempts to throw out the entire health-care law.
Led by the state of Texas,18 Republican state attorneys general argued last week that a federal appeals court should uphold a ruling in December from a federal judge in Texas that struck down the law. They say law is unconstitutional because of the move by Congress in 2017 to eliminate the so-called individual mandate, which imposes a tax penalty on uninsured taxpayers and was considered a cornerstone of the health law. A coalition of Democratic state attorneys general, led by California's Xavier Becerra, appealed the lower court ruling and are defending the health law.