Blackstone Executive Vice Chairman Tony James says he's less optimistic now than before that the U.S.-China trade war could be resolved, but even a smaller deal could help...World Economyread more
The massive market transformation this month that some on Wall Street called a "once in a decade opportunity" might have just been a one-off technical move because of taxes.Marketsread more
The Pentagon will deploy U.S. forces to the Middle East on the heels of the attack on Saudi Arabian oil facilities, United States Secretary of Defense Mark Esper announced...Defenseread more
CNBC did a deep dive through the most recent Wall Street research to find stocks that analysts say are underappreciated.Marketsread more
Shares of MasterCard are up 46% this year, and 1120% since 2011, getting a boost from the strong U.S. consumer.Investingread more
CNBC sat in on an "empathy training" at Amazon PillPack's Somerville offices, which is part of new hire orientation.Technologyread more
Trade with China is the 'big unknown' for the Federal Reserve as it decides how best to support the U.S. economy, says Council on Foreign Relations Director of International...Futures Nowread more
Lobbying experts said the visit is likely an attempt to be in lawmakers' ears as they consider legislation that would impact Facebook.Technologyread more
Yardeni Research's Edward Yardeni believes the U.S. economy is picking up steam.Trading Nationread more
Iran's audacious drone and cruise missile attack on Saudi Arabia's oil producing facilities has provided a critical test yet for the Trump administration's foreign policy. A...Politicsread more
Senate Republicans told the Supreme Court on Thursday that they will work to prevent Democrats from expanding the size of the nine-member panel.
In an unusual letter, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the 52 other Republican members of the Senate took issue with a friend-of-the-court brief filed earlier this month by Senate Democrats.
That brief, led by Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, warned the court that it was "not well" and urged it to "heal itself before the public demands it be 'restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics,' citing language from a recent Quinnipiac University poll.
"It's one thing for politicians to peddle these ideas in Tweets or on the stump," the Republican senators wrote. "But the Democrats' [friend-of-the-court] brief demonstrates that their court-packing plans are more than mere pandering. They are a direct, immediate threat to the independence of the judiciary and the rights of all Americans."
The Republicans characterized the brief, and in particular the plans to expand the size of the court, as a "direct, immediate threat" to the independence of the federal judiciary.
"While we remain Members of this body, the Democrats' threat to "restructure[ ]" the Court is an empty one," the senators wrote. They said they shared the view of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the senior member of the court's liberal wing, who said this year that she opposed court expansion, noting "nine seems to be a good number."
Democratic candidates for president have proposed various reforms for the top court, including expanding its size and altering the way judges are selected. South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts are among the top candidates who have said they are open to increasing the number of justices. Gillibrand, who dropped out of the presidential race on Wednesday, signed onto Whitehouse's brief.
The Democrats' brief argued that the court was in danger of being perceived as cozy with conservative organizations such at The Federalist Society, an influential legal group, and the National Rifle Association, whose members include gun owners.
In a statement on Thursday, Whitehouse said that the response to his brief "from Republicans and the partisan donor interests driving the Court's polarization shows exactly why it's time to speak out."
"They want us to shut up about their capture of the Court; we will not," the senator said.
Both the letter and Democrats' earlier brief are atypical. The Supreme Court, which seeks to portray itself as being above the partisan political fray, has found itself at the center of a divisive political struggle, particularly after the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy last year enabled President Donald Trump to shift the balance of the body with the appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Chief Justice John Roberts has sought to push back on questions about the court's legitimacy as a nonpartisan legal authority. After President Donald Trump accused a federal judge in California last year of being an "Obama judge," Roberts issued a rare statement.
"We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts wrote at the time. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for."
The Supreme Court did not respond to a request for comment.