Investors largely expected the FOMC to cut rates by a quarter point.The Fedread more
This is a comparison of Wednesday's FOMC statement with the one issued on July 31 after the Fed's previous policymaking meeting.The Fedread more
Ahead of the Fed's 2 p.m. announcement, many economists were forecasting one further cut in 2019, but some investors were hoping for two more this year.The Fedread more
The interest on excess reserves now stands at 1.8%, a 30 basis point cut compared to the 25 basis point reduction for the benchmark funds rate.The Fedread more
Stocks traded lower on Wednesday as traders digested the Federal Reserve's latest decision on U.S. monetary policy.US Marketsread more
For consumers, lower rates do mean cheaper loans, which can impact your mortgage, home equity loan, credit card, student loan tab and car payment. n the flip side, you'll earn...Personal Financeread more
Gold edged lower on Wednesday but held about the key $1,500 per ounce level after the U.S. Federal Reserve decided to cut interest rates.Futures & Commoditiesread more
As the Federal Reserve lowers rates, some banks are pulling back their offerings on their savings accounts and certificates of deposit. Even so, they are still pretty good by...Personal Financeread more
Activists with Black Lives Matter, who met privately with Buttigieg in the weeks after police shot and killed Eric Logan, say the 37-year-old mayor brushed off their concerns...2020 Electionsread more
The report, published by Rep. Carolyn Maloney, used data from the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and the Centers for Disease Control to estimate the cost of gun...Politicsread more
case@ (Adds details, quotes, background)
LONDON, Sept 4 (Reuters) - Prime Minister Boris Johnson's decision to suspend parliament later this month until shortly before Britain leaves the European Union is lawful, a Scottish court ruled on Wednesday, saying the matter was not one for judges to decide.
More than 70 opposition lawmakers had challenged Johnson's right to suspend, or "prorogue" parliament, arguing it was illegal and unconstitutional because his intent was to force through a no-deal Brexit on Oct. 31 by limiting the opportunity for opponents to object.
Judge Raymond Doherty said the question was not a matter for judicial interference and was a political issue which should be judged by parliament and the electorate. He said it was up to parliament to decide when it sat.
"In my opinion, there has been no contravention of the rule of law. Parliament is the master of its own proceedings, rules and privileges," Doherty told Scotland's Court of Session.
"This is political territory and decision-making which cannot be measured against legal standards and only by political judgments," he added.
Joanna Cherry, a Scottish National Party lawmaker who led the challenge, said they would seek to appeal the decision.
Johnson announced on Aug. 28 that he would suspend parliament from mid-September to mid-October, shortly before Britain is due to exit the EU on Oct. 31, so that his Conservative government could announce a new legislative program.
The Scottish court was told on Tuesday that a memo passed to Johnson two weeks beforehand indicated he was looking to suspend parliament while his aides were publicly denying there were any such plans.
The case is one of three legal bids to stop the prorogation.
Businesswoman Gina Miller, who in 2017 successfully forced the government to get parliamentary approval before it formally issued Britain's divorce notice to the EU, is taking a challenge to Londons High Court on Thursday, a case backed by former Conservative Prime Minister John Major.
Another case is due to be heard in Northern Ireland on Friday.
Cherry said she was hopeful her case would be successful on appeal, referring to the European Court of Justice's decision last December that Britain could unilaterally revoke its Article 50 notice to leave the EU following the "Wightman" case she brought with other Scottish lawmakers.
"Important to recall we lost the Wightman case on unilateral revocation of (Article 50) at 1st instance & went on to win it in Scotlands appeal court & in CJEU in Luxembourg," Cherry wrote on Twitter. (Reporting by Michael Holden; editing by Costas Pitas and Stephen Addison)