The massive market transformation this month that some on Wall Street called a "once in a decade opportunity" might have just been a one-off technical move because of taxes.Marketsread more
The Pentagon will deploy U.S. forces to the Middle East on the heels of the attack on Saudi Arabian oil facilities, United States Secretary of Defense Mark Esper announced...Defenseread more
Iran's audacious drone and cruise missile attack on Saudi Arabia's oil producing facilities has provided a critical test yet for the Trump administration's foreign policy. A...Politicsread more
CNBC did a deep dive through the most recent Wall Street research to find stocks that analysts say are underappreciated.Marketsread more
Shares of MasterCard are up 46% this year, and 1120% since 2011, getting a boost from the strong U.S. consumer.Investingread more
Trade with China is the 'big unknown' for the Federal Reserve as it decides how best to support the U.S. economy, says Council on Foreign Relations Director of International...Futures Nowread more
Lobbying experts said the visit is likely an attempt to be in lawmakers' ears as they consider legislation that would impact Facebook.Technologyread more
Chinese trade negotiators suddenly canceled a visit to meet U.S. farmers after they wrapped up trade talks in Washington this week.Marketsread more
Blackstone Executive Vice Chairman Tony James says he's less optimistic now than before that the U.S.-China trade war could be resolved, but even a smaller deal could help...World Economyread more
Progress on trade talks will determine how far market will move above new highs.Trader Talk with Bob Pisaniread more
Sept 12 (Reuters) - A driver for Uber has sued the company for misclassifying its drivers as independent contractors, hours after California legislators voted to help thousands of those workers become, and enjoy the benefits of being, employees.
The proposed class action filed on Wednesday might by Uber driver Angela McRay appears to be the first since California's senate passed landmark legislation that could affect workers in many industries, in addition to ride-sharing companies such as Uber Technologies Inc.
Governor Gavin Newsom supports the proposed law, which is known as Assembly Bill 5 and would take effect on Jan. 1, though it may undergo changes before it reaches his desk.
McRay, a Pittsburg, California, resident who said she has driven for Uber since November 2016, faulted the company for having "publicly stated that it intends to defy this statute," by continuing to treat drivers as independent contractors.
"This ongoing defiance of the law constitutes a willful violation of California law," the complaint said. McRay is seeking damages for Uber drivers in California, and an injunction requiring compliance.
Uber did not immediately respond on Thursday to a requests for comment.
Chief Legal Officer Tony West said on Wednesday that the law did not automatically reclassify drivers, but Uber could "pass the harder test to the satisfaction of arbitrators and courts."
The law has attracted national attention because of the size of California's workforce, which includes several hundred thousand contract workers.
Labor groups and other supporters of the law have said it would help long-suffering contractors by entitling them to coverage under minimum wage and overtime laws, and afford greater access to health insurance and expense reimbursements.
The law has also been criticized by trade groups and "gig economy" companies dependent on contract workers because of the extra financial burdens.
Assembly Bill 5 would codify a 2018 California Supreme Court decision that narrowed when employers could classify workers as independent contractors.
Uber, rival Lyft Inc and DoorDash have pushed for separate legislation to boost driver pay and benefits while preserving their independent contractor status.
In March, Uber agreed to pay $20 million to settle a nearly six-year-old lawsuit by California and Massachusetts drivers over their classifications.
The case is McRay v Uber Technologies Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 19-05723.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Additional reporting by Daniel Wiessner Editing by Nick Zieminski)