The real reason Trump commuted the 27-year sentence of a kosher meat packing exec
- President Trump commuted Sholom Rubashkin's 27 year prison sentence Wednesday.
- The decision seems to have no real political or financial benefits connected to it.
- But it does fit a pattern of President Trump taking on the D.C. bureaucratic establishment by championing an issue close to religious Jews.
Is President Donald Trump making a play for the Jewish vote?
It might seem like it after tens of thousands of religious Jews took to the streets of Brooklyn Wednesday night to celebrate President Trump's decision to commute the sentence of former Agriprocessors CEO Sholom Rubashkin.
The reasons for presidential pardons and commutations over the years have almost always been political and/or meant to send a grand message. But finding a clear reason for this decision isn't easy.
The Chasidic Jewish Rubashkin was convicted in 2009 of several crimes connected to his family's massive kosher slaughterhouse operation headquartered in Postville, Iowa. They included money laundering and financial fraud. Moreover, the financial prosecution came after federal authorities raided the Agriprocessors plant and arrested 389 illegal immigrants working there in 2008.
Rusbashkin's guilt was really never in doubt. But his sentence was another story. Federal Judge Linda Reade slapped the now 57-year-old Rubashkin with 27 years behind bars; what many argued was essentially a life sentence.
That set off a series of protests first from Rubashkin's own Chasidic community and then from a series of Democrat and Republican elected leaders who noted he was getting a more severe punishment than Enron's Jeff Skilling.
It was that bipartisan push for leniency for Rubashkin that the White House used as an explanation for the president's decision.
But clemency is usually not about bipartisanship; it's about rewarding or possibly gaining a valuable base of voters.
On an incredibly micro level, one could argue that President Trump was indeed playing to some of his base supporters with this move. While 71% of the Jewish community voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, Trump won the American Orthodox Jewish vote and 68 percent of the vote in the heavily Chasidic and ultra-orthodox Jewish Brooklyn neighborhood of Borough Park.
But even if every Chasidic voter in Borough Park and Crown Heights voted for President Trump in 2020, he'd still stand no chance of winning New York state, the city, or even Brooklyn. Jews make only about three percent of the total vote in the U.S. anyway.
Another explanation for this decision could be campaign donations. That was the charge when President Bill Clinton pardoned financier Mark Rich in 2000. That move prompted an FBI probe in part because Rich's wife Denise had been making campaign donations to the Democrats.
The Rubashkin family has made donations to the Republicans in the past, but not to President Trump. The family is no longer very wealthy at this time. And while the Chabad Lubavitch network is a nonprofit powerhouse with worldwide reach and visibility, it doesn't make campaign donations or make official endorsements. So this decision to please the tiny Orthodox Jewish community still doesn't really add up based on the usual metrics.
But it starts to make sense in the context of another decision President Trump made recently that cheered that same religious community. That would be President Trump's move to change U.S. policy and officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
A major result of that decision is that it threw much of establishment Washington for a loop. It forced it to reconsider a key cautionary restriction the U.S. has always put into its otherwise warm relationship with Israel. In that way, the Jerusalem decision was about sending a message to the State Department's career bureaucrats just as much as it was a message to foreign countries.
Similarly, Jewish Americans have long enjoyed success and acceptance in the United States, but the Orthodox community has felt slighted by the justice system in some cases. That would include the Rubashkin sentence and the long sentence for the now-released Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard.
President Trump now seems to be sending a message about those sentencing and prosecutorial practices to the many Justice Department officials who were involved with this case and also to Judge Reade. No, the Rubashkin commutation didn't gain the kind of headlines the Jerusalem decision did. But career federal prosecutors are not likely to miss this news.
President Obama did something very similar at the end of his term, albeit on a much grander scale. He decided to grant hundreds of commutations and pardons to people convicted of drug-related crimes. That move was meant to send a much larger message about our drug laws and sentencing rules.
The difference in the timing stands out. Most presidents wait until their final days in power or at least their second terms in office to grant clemency in order to avoid any political backlash. Love or hate President Trump's decision to pardon former Sheriff Joe Arpaio and give Rubashkin this commutation, at least he's had the guts to make those moves at a time when it could actually cost him.
The final cost/benefit analysis makes it clear that this was not some kind of Trump reach for an all-too-small Jewish vote. This makes much more sense as the way to send a message to the establishment, or "the swamp." Whether the swamp gets the message and responds accordingly is yet to be seen.
Commentary by Jake Novak, CNBC.com senior columnist. Follow him on Twitter @jakejakeny.
For more insight from CNBC contributors, follow @CNBCopinion on Twitter.
Biden defends why stimulus checks should go to Americans with jobs
January 15 is last day for stimulus payments before tax season—unless you're part of these groups
Mega Millions jackpot skyrockets to $850 million. Do this first if you win
Man makes last-ditch effort to recover $280 million in bitcoin he accidentally threw out
NRA files for bankruptcy, says it will reincorporate in Texas